From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

In re Rose

DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA COURT OF APPEALS
Jul 27, 2017
164 A.3d 931 (D.C. 2017)

Opinion

No. 17–BS–283

07-27-2017

IN RE: David L. ROSE, Respondent. Bar Registration No. 376379


AMENDED ORDER

This order has been amended to reflect the respondent's full name.
--------

PER CURIAM

Upon consideration of the petition of the Board on Professional Responsibility's (the "Board") pursuant to D.C. Bar R. XI, § 13(c), to suspend respondent indefinitely based on disability, and the Board's motion to file under seal, and it appearing that neither respondent nor Disciplinary Counsel has interposed any objection thereto, it is hereby

ORDERED that the Board's motion to file under seal is granted. It is

FURTHER ORDERED that respondent is indefinitely suspended from the practice of law in the District of Columbia, effective immediately, and any pending matters be held in abeyance pursuant to D.C. Bar R. XI § 13(g). It is

FURTHER ORDERED that respondent's attention is drawn to requirements of D.C. Bar R. XI, §§ 14 and 16, relating to suspended attorneys. It is

FURTHER ORDERED that respondent shall file an affidavit in compliance with D.C. Bar R. XI, § 14(g) with the Court and the Board and shall serve a copy of the affidavit on Disciplinary Counsel.


Summaries of

In re Rose

DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA COURT OF APPEALS
Jul 27, 2017
164 A.3d 931 (D.C. 2017)
Case details for

In re Rose

Case Details

Full title:IN RE: DAVID L. ROSE, Respondent. Bar Registration No. 376379

Court:DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA COURT OF APPEALS

Date published: Jul 27, 2017

Citations

164 A.3d 931 (D.C. 2017)

Citing Cases

In re Wilkin

In this also I think the commissioner was mistaken, as the following cases hold otherwise and clearly show…

In re Watts

); In re Harralson, 179 F. 490, 29 L.R.A. (N.S.) 737 (8 C.C.A.); In re Rose (D.C.) 193 F. 815; Black on…