From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

In re Richardson

Supreme Court of California
Mar 19, 1942
20 Cal.2d 894 (Cal. 1942)

Opinion

Docket No. Crim. 4277.

March 19, 1942.

PROCEEDING on an order to show cause why an attorney should not be disbarred. Matter referred to The State Bar for investigation and report. ( 15 Cal.2d 536 [ 102 P.2d 1076].) Upon recommendation of The State Bar, order discharged.

Miguel Estudillo, Robert W. Kenny and Morris E. Cohn for Petitioner.

Philbrick McCoy for Respondent.


MEMORANDUM CASES

[Prior opinion ( 15 Cal.2d 536).]


THE COURT.

It appearing upon investigation and report by The State Bar that the facts and circumstances surrounding the conviction of Jerome Lyman Richardson, on his plea of guilty in action No. 27812 in the District Court of the United States in and for the Northern District of New York, do not disclose moral turpitude to have been involved in the commission of the offense, the order to show cause heretofore issued herein is discharged.


Summaries of

In re Richardson

Supreme Court of California
Mar 19, 1942
20 Cal.2d 894 (Cal. 1942)
Case details for

In re Richardson

Case Details

Full title:In re JEROME LYMAN RICHARDSON, on Disbarment

Court:Supreme Court of California

Date published: Mar 19, 1942

Citations

20 Cal.2d 894 (Cal. 1942)
123 P.2d 11

Citing Cases

Lorenz v. Bd. of Medical Examiners of Cal.

In an earlier case, In re Richardson, 15 Cal.2d 536, 102 P.2d 1076, 1079, a reference was ordered for an…