From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

In re Reeves

Supreme Court of New Jersey
Jun 5, 1972
291 A.2d 369 (N.J. 1972)

Opinion

Argued May 8, 1972 —

Decided June 5, 1972.

Appeal from Mercer County Juvenile and Domestic Relations Court.

Mr. Michael S. Bokar argued the cause for appellant.

Ms. Joan W. Murphy, Deputy Attorney General, argued the cause for the Attorney General of New Jersey, amicus curiae ( Mr. Stephen Skillman, Assistant Attorney General, of counsel; Mr. George F. Kugler, Jr., Attorney General of New Jersey, attorney).


Defendant was convicted of contempt and sentenced to 60 days in jail. We certified his appeal before argument in the Appellate Division. We do not reach the issue which prompted certification because the conviction must be reversed for failure to comply with the rules relating to summary prosecutions for contempt. What started out as a proceeding to enforce a litigant's right to moneys due from defendant under a support order became, without notice, a penal prosecution resulting in a fixed jail sentence. This, of course, violated the clear mandate of R. 1:10-2 to 4. See New Jersey Dep't of Health v. Roselle, 34 N.J. 331 (1961); In re Carton, 48 N.J. 9 (1966). The rule relating to enforcement of a support order, R. 4:79-9(b), expressly refers to the basic contempt rules we have just cited.

The judgment is therefore reversed.

For reversal — Chief Justice WEINTRAUB and Justices JACOBS, FRANCIS, PROCTOR, HALL, SCHETTINO and MOUNTAIN — 7.

For affirmance — None.


Summaries of

In re Reeves

Supreme Court of New Jersey
Jun 5, 1972
291 A.2d 369 (N.J. 1972)
Case details for

In re Reeves

Case Details

Full title:IN THE MATTER OF GEORGE REEVES, CHARGED WITH CONTEMPT OF COURT

Court:Supreme Court of New Jersey

Date published: Jun 5, 1972

Citations

291 A.2d 369 (N.J. 1972)
291 A.2d 369

Citing Cases

Pasqua v. Council

Essex County Welfare Bd. v. Perkins, 133 N.J.Super. 189, 195, 336 A.2d 16 (App.Div.) (citing In re Reeves, 60…

Essex County Welfare Bd. v. Perkins

A fixed jail sentence may be imposed. See New Jersey Department of Health v. Roselle, supra; In re Carton, 48…