From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

In re Raymond

Supreme Court of Michigan
May 2, 2008
480 Mich. 1194 (Mich. 2008)

Opinion

No. 134461.

May 2, 2008.

Reported below: 276 Mich App 22.


Order Granting Oral Argument in Case Pending on Application for Leave to Appeal May 2, 2008:

We direct the clerk to schedule oral argument on whether to grant the application or take other peremptory action. MCR 7.302(G)(1). The parties shall submit supplemental briefs within 42 days of the date of this order addressing: (1) whether the will's language is sufficient to convey the possibility that the class of "brother[s] and sisters that survive me" might have no members; (2) whether the language "or to the survivor or survivors thereof" creates an alternative devise to the descendants of predeceased siblings of the testator (or Claude Raymond) which only takes effect if all of the testator's (or Claude Raymond's) siblings predecease the testator; (3) what significance, if any, should be attributed to the placement of the language "share and share alike" in the middle of the pertinent clause, rather than at the end; and (4) what effect, if any, the antilapse statute (MCL 700.2603) should have on the construction of the will language at issue. The parties should not submit mere restatements of their application papers.


Summaries of

In re Raymond

Supreme Court of Michigan
May 2, 2008
480 Mich. 1194 (Mich. 2008)
Case details for

In re Raymond

Case Details

Full title:IN RE RAYMOND ESTATE (MORSE v. SHARKEY)

Court:Supreme Court of Michigan

Date published: May 2, 2008

Citations

480 Mich. 1194 (Mich. 2008)

Citing Cases

In re Raymond Estate

Respondents sought leave to appeal in this Court. We granted oral argument on respondents' application for…