From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

In re Pulido

Supreme Court of Illinois
Jan 13, 1978
372 N.E.2d 822 (Ill. 1978)

Summary

applying Rule 609(b), right to bail

Summary of this case from In re W.C

Opinion

No. 50298. Supervisory order entered.

Supervisory order entered January 13, 1978.

Appeal from the Appellate Court for the First District; heard in that court on appeal from the Circuit Court of Cook County, the Hon. John W. Rogers, Judge, presiding.

Sam Adam, of Chicago, for appellant.

Bernard Carey, State's Attorney, of Chicago (Lee T. Hettinger and James V. Marcanti, Assistant State's Attorneys, of counsel), for the People.


After a finding of juvenile delinquency and commitment to a correctional facility, the defendant moved for bond pending appeal. Both the trial court and appellate court denied the motion on the ground of lack of jurisdiction. Supreme Court Rule 660(a) ( 65 Ill. 2 d R. 660(a)) provides that appeals from final judgments in delinquent minor proceedings shall be governed by the rules applicable to criminal cases, except as otherwise provided. Rule 609(b) (58 Ill.2d R. 609(b)) provides for bail pending appeal where a defendant is sentenced to imprisonment. There is no statutory provision or rule providing that Rule 609 does not apply in juvenile delinquency cases, and the trial court and appellate court were in error in holding that they lacked jurisdiction to fix bond. Since applications for bond pending appeal should be addressed in the first instance to the trial court, we express no opinion as to whether bond should be allowed. It is ordered, in the exercise of this court's supervisory jurisdiction, that the circuit court of Cook County, juvenile division, consider defendant's application for bond pending appeal.

It is unnecessary to consider the motion by petitioner for bond pending appeal, or, in the alternative, to remand this cause to the trial court with instructions.

The motion by petitioner for leave to present oral argument on motion for bond pending appeal is denied.

Supervisory order entered.


Summaries of

In re Pulido

Supreme Court of Illinois
Jan 13, 1978
372 N.E.2d 822 (Ill. 1978)

applying Rule 609(b), right to bail

Summary of this case from In re W.C
Case details for

In re Pulido

Case Details

Full title:In re ERNESTO PULIDO, a Minor, Appellant. — (The People of the State of…

Court:Supreme Court of Illinois

Date published: Jan 13, 1978

Citations

372 N.E.2d 822 (Ill. 1978)
372 N.E.2d 822

Citing Cases

People ex Rel. Davis v. Vazquez

This court has held that juveniles have the same right to be released on bail pending an appeal of an…

In re W.C

) A few examples of supreme court rules applicable to criminal cases that also govern delinquency appeals are…