From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Pravda v. New York State Department of Motor Vehicles

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Third Department
Sep 27, 2001
286 A.D.2d 838 (N.Y. App. Div. 2001)

Opinion

Decided and Entered: September 27, 2001.

Appeals (1) from a judgment of the Supreme Court (Kane, J.), entered April 26, 2000 in Albany County, which, in a proceeding pursuant to CPLR article 78, dismissed the petition as, inter alia, untimely, and (2) from an order of said court, entered June 5, 2000 in Albany County, which denied petitioner's motion for reconsideration.

Frank Pravda, Saratoga Springs, appellant pro se.

Eliot Spitzer, Attorney-General (Peter G. Crary of counsel), Albany, for respondent.

Before: Mercure, J.P., Peters, Spain, Carpinello and, Lahtinen, JJ.


MEMORANDUM AND ORDER


We agree with respondent that petitioner's appeals must be dismissed. Respondent has demonstrated that a copy of the judgment entered April 26, 2000, together with notice of entry, was served on petitioner on April 26, 2000 pursuant to CPLR 2103 (b). Petitioner's June 13, 2000 notice of appeal, therefore, is untimely (see, CPLR 5513 [a]) and the appeal from the judgment must be dismissed (see, Matter of Loeber v. Teresi, 256 A.D.2d 747, 749-750). Petitioner'spro se status does not relieve him of the obligation to comply with the time requirements for taking an appeal (see generally, Brooks v. Inn at Saratoga Assn., 188 A.D.2d 921). The May 31, 2000 order denying petitioner's motion for reconsideration of the dismissal of his petition was, in essence, the denial of a motion to reargue, which is not appealable (see, Matter of Dearstyne v. Rensselaer County District Attorney, 262 A.D.2d 723, lv dismissed 93 N.Y.2d 1036) and did not extend the time to appeal from the underlying judgment (see, Matter of Barnes [Council 82, AFSCME], 235 A.D.2d 826).

Mercure, J.P., Peters, Spain and Carpinello, JJ., concur.

ORDERED that the appeals are dismissed, without costs.


Summaries of

Pravda v. New York State Department of Motor Vehicles

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Third Department
Sep 27, 2001
286 A.D.2d 838 (N.Y. App. Div. 2001)
Case details for

Pravda v. New York State Department of Motor Vehicles

Case Details

Full title:In the Matter of FRANK PRAVDA, Appellant, v. NEW YORK STATE DEPARTMENT OF…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Third Department

Date published: Sep 27, 2001

Citations

286 A.D.2d 838 (N.Y. App. Div. 2001)
730 N.Y.S.2d 746

Citing Cases

Ireland v. Wilenzik

With respect to that portion of the March 2001 order that dismissed plaintiff's motion, we agree with Supreme…

In the Matter of Davis v. Goord

Finally, no appeal lies from the denial of a motion to reargue ( see Matter of Pravda v. New York State…