From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

In re Petition for Disciplinary Action Against Brian Campbell Fischer

Supreme Court of Minnesota.
Sep 12, 2017
901 N.W.2d 155 (Minn. 2017)

Opinion

A15-1483.

09-12-2017

IN RE Petition for DISCIPLINARY ACTION AGAINST Brian Campbell FISCHER, a Minnesota Attorney, Registration No. 0318097.


ORDER

On May 3, 2017, we suspended respondent Brian Campbell Fischer from the practice of law for a minimum of 90 days, effective May 17, 2017. Respondent has filed an affidavit seeking reinstatement in which he states that he has fully complied with the terms of the suspension order, except for successful completion of the written examination required for admission to the practice of law by the State Board of Law Examiners on the subject of professional responsibility. The Director of the Office of Lawyers Professional Responsibility does not oppose the request.

Based upon all the files, records, and proceedings herein,

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED THAT:

1. Respondent Brian Campbell Fischer is conditionally reinstated to the practice of law in the State of Minnesota, subject to his successful completion of the written examination required for admission to the practice of law by the State Board of Law Examiners on the subject of professional responsibility, and is placed on probation for 2 years, subject to the following conditions:

a. Respondent shall cooperate fully with the Director's Office in its efforts to monitor compliance with this probation. Respondent shall promptly respond to the Director's correspondence by its due date. Respondent shall provide the Director with a current mailing address and shall immediately notify the Director of any change of address. Respondent shall cooperate with the Director's investigation of any allegations of unprofessional conduct that may come to the Director's attention. Upon the Director's request, respondent shall provide authorization for release of information and documentation to verify respondent's compliance with the terms of this probation.

b. Respondent shall abide by the Minnesota Rules of Professional Conduct.

c. Respondent shall be supervised by a licensed Minnesota attorney, appointed by the Director, to monitor compliance with the terms of this probation. Within 2 weeks from the date of this order, respondent shall provide the Director with the names of four attorneys who have agreed to be nominated as respondent's supervisor. If, after diligent effort, respondent is unable to locate a supervisor acceptable to the Director, the Director shall seek to appoint a supervisor. Until a supervisor has signed a consent to supervise, respondent shall, on the first day of each month, provide the Director with an inventory of client files as described in paragraph (d) below. Respondent shall make active client files available to the Director upon request.

d. Respondent shall cooperate fully with the supervisor's efforts to monitor compliance with this probation. Respondent shall contact the supervisor and schedule a minimum of one in-person meeting per calendar quarter. Respondent shall submit to the supervisor an inventory of all active client files by the first day of each month during the probation. With respect to each active file, the inventory shall disclose the client name, type of representation, date

opened, most recent activity, next anticipated action, and anticipated closing date. Respondent's supervisor shall file written reports with the Director at least quarterly, or at such more frequent intervals as the Director may reasonably request.

e. Respondent shall initiate and maintain office procedures that ensure that there are prompt responses to correspondence, telephone calls, and other important communications from clients, courts, and other persons interested in matters that respondent is handling and that will ensure that respondent regularly reviews each and every file and completes legal matters on a timely basis.

f. Within 30 days from the date of this order, respondent shall provide to the Director and to his probation supervisor, if any, a written plan outlining office procedures designed to ensure that respondent is in compliance with probation requirements. Respondent shall provide progress reports as requested.

g. Respondent shall continue current treatment by a licensed consulting psychologist or other mental health professional acceptable to the Director and shall complete all therapy programs recommended by all treating therapists or other specialists.

h. Respondent shall not represent clients in disputes sounding in personal injury, medical malpractice, or workers' compensation without associating with qualified counsel through a joint representation agreement. Such agreements shall be provided to respondent's probation supervisor, and respondent shall authorize his probation supervisor and the Director to discuss the joint representation with co-counsel. Respondent shall inform co-counsel of the terms of his probation. Respondent shall further limit his practice to ensure that the only litigated matters he undertakes are either through a joint representation agreement as specified above or as contract counsel working under the direct supervision of counsel responsible for the client representation. Respondent will limit any non-litigation representation to estate or business planning work that is completed within a month.

2. By May 3, 2018, respondent shall comply with Rule 18(e)(3), Rules on Lawyers Professional Responsibility (RLPR), by filing with the Clerk of the Appellate Courts and serving upon the Director proof of respondent's successful completion of the written examination required for admission to the practice of law by the State Board of Law Examiners on the subject of professional responsibility. Failure to do so shall result in automatic re-suspension pending proof of successful completion of the examination, under Rule 18(e)(3), RLPR.

BY THE COURT:

/s/ ______________________________

David R. Stras

Associate Justice


Summaries of

In re Petition for Disciplinary Action Against Brian Campbell Fischer

Supreme Court of Minnesota.
Sep 12, 2017
901 N.W.2d 155 (Minn. 2017)
Case details for

In re Petition for Disciplinary Action Against Brian Campbell Fischer

Case Details

Full title:IN RE Petition for DISCIPLINARY ACTION AGAINST Brian Campbell FISCHER, a…

Court:Supreme Court of Minnesota.

Date published: Sep 12, 2017

Citations

901 N.W.2d 155 (Minn. 2017)

Citing Cases

Office of Lawyer Regulation v. Fischer (In re Disciplinary Proceedings against Fischer)

¶8 On September 12, 2017, the Minnesota Court conditionally reinstated Attorney Fischer from the 90-day…

In re Fischer

We conditionally reinstated respondent on September 12, 2017, subject to successful completion of the written…