From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

In re Opinion of Justices

Supreme Judicial Court of Maine
May 18, 1955
117 A.2d 57 (Me. 1955)

Opinion

No Number in Original

May 18, 1955, Decided


SENATE ORDER PROPOUNDING QUESTION

STATE OF MAINE

WHEREAS, it appears to the Senate of the Ninety-Seventh Legislature that the following is an important question of law and the occasion a solemn one, and

WHEREAS, there is pending before the Senate of the Ninety-Seventh Legislature a Bill (Senate Paper 551, Legislative Document 1489) entitled, AN ACT Relating to the Hospitalization of the Mentally Ill, and

WHEREAS, the Honorable Justices of the Supreme Judicial Court, under date of May 11, 1955, have given their opinion to the House of Representatives of the Ninety-Seventh Legislature that said Bill, as written, does not provide a method of hospitalizing the mentally ill that is in accord with Section 6 of Article I of the Constitution of Maine, and

WHEREAS, it is the desire of the Ninety-Seventh Legislature to enact legislation that will facilitate the orderly hospitalization of the mentally ill within the protection afforded to all citizens by the Constitution of the State of Maine, and

WHEREAS, the Senate has accepted Senate Amendment "A" to Senate Paper 551, Legislative Document 1489, which is Exhibit A attached hereto, to provide the hospitalized patient an immediate method of instituting proceedings within the period of restraint to test the necessity of the involuntary hospitalization, and

WHEREAS, it is important that the Legislature be informed as to the constitutionality of the proposed Bill, as amended,

ORDERED, that in accordance with the provisions of the Constitution of the State, the Justices of the Supreme Judicial Court are hereby respectfully requested to give the Senate their opinion on the following question:

Would Senate Paper 551, Legislative Document 1489, "AN ACT Relating to the Hospitalization of the Mentally Ill," as amended by Senate Amendment "A", if enacted by the Legislature in its present form, be constitutional?

In Senate Chamber

May 18, 1955

READ AND PASSED

CHESTER T. WINSLOW,

Secretary.

Reid

Kennebec

A true copy. Attest: CHESTER T. WINSLOW

NEW DRAFT OF S. P. 480--L. D. 1349

NINETY-SEVENTH LEGISLATURE

Legislative Document No. 1489

S. P. 551 In Senate, April 22, 1955

Reported by Senator Reid of Kennebec from the Committee on Judiciary and printed under Joint Rules No. 10.

CHESTER T. WINSLOW, Secretary

STATE OF MAINE

IN THE YEAR OF OUR LORD NINETEEN HUNDRED FIFTY-FIVE

AN ACT Relating to Hospitalization of the Mentally Ill.

Be it enacted by the People of the State of Maine, as follows:

Sec. 1. R. S., c. 27, §§ 103-A - 103-F, additional. Chapter 27 of the revised statutes is hereby amended by adding thereto 6 new sections to be numbered 103-A to 103-F, to read as follows:

designate or, upon receipt of a certificate from the Veterans Administration or other agency of the United States Government showing that facilities are available and that such person is eligible for care and treatment therein, to said Veterans Administration or other agency, and at the expense of the town or city. The said person shall be accompanied by true copies of the petition and the physician's certificate together with a statement of facts satisfactory to the Department in regard to the financial ability of such patient or any of his relatives legally liable for his support. Any petition or physician's certificate bearing a date more than 10 days prior to the date of arrival of the said petition at the hospital for admission shall be void and no physician's certificate shall be valid or accepted if signed by a physician employed by the hospital for the mentally ill to which said person is admitted. No feeble-minded person shall be accepted by any State hospital for the mentally ill.

Sec. 103-B. Preliminary observation; emergency procedure. The superintendent or head of the hospital to which the alleged mentally ill person is sent or his duly appointed substitute shall substitute, may send an order requiring the municipality to transport the said person from the hospital to the municipality. This order shall be enforceable by mandamus.

Sec. 103-D. Probate court proceedings. The hearing may be conducted in as informal a manner as may be consistent with orderly procedure and in a physical setting not likely to have a harmful effect on the mental health of the proposed patient. The court shall receive all relevant and material evidence which may be offered and shall not be bound by the rules of evidence. The court shall have the authority to summon such witnesses United States Government and shall direct the superintendent or the Veterans Administration or other agency of the United States Government to receive and detain him until he no longer has need for treatment or is discharged by law or by the superintendent, or Veterans Administration or other agency of the United States Government.

Sec. 103-E. Jurisdiction of probate courts and municipal officers; standard procedure. The probate court in the county where a person resides or may be found, or the municipal officers of the municipality where a person resides or may be found, or a committee of not less than 3 thereof, shall have jurisdiction to order a person to be hospitalized for an indeterminate period where it shall be found that the person is mentally ill, and because of his illness is likely to injure himself or others if allowed to remain at liberty, or is in need of custody, care or treatment in a mental hospital and, because of his illness, lacks sufficient insight or capacity to make responsible decisions with respect to his hospitalization. Proceedings may be commenced by the filing of a petition for hearing by a blood relative, husband or wife, municipal or state police notice shall be sent by registered mail to the person signing the petition.

Sec. 103-F. Procedure before probate court or municipal officers. The hearing before the probate court or municipal officers shall be as in the case of hearings before the probate court following emergency detention as provided in sections 103-C and 103-D. If the person alleged to be mentally ill refuses to submit to examination by 2 physicians, then the court or the municipal officers shall so order him.

If upon completion of the hearing and consideration of the evidence, the probate court or the municipal officers find that the person is mentally ill, and because of his illness is likely to injure himself or others if allowed to remain at liberty, or is in need of custody, care or treatment in a mental hospital and, because of his illness, lacks sufficient capacity or insight to make responsible decisions with respect to hopitalization, the court or municipal officers shall forthwith order the alleged mentally ill person to be taken to such State hospital as it or they may properly designate or, upon receipt of a certificate from the Veterans Administration or other agency of the United States Government showing that facilities are available and that such person is eligible for care and treatment therein, to said Veterans Administration or other agency and at the expense of the municipality in which he resided or was found.

The municipal officers of a town or city are hereby constituted a court of record when acting pursuant to the provisions of this section.'

Sec. 2. R. S., c. 27, §§ 104-113, repealed. Section 104 to 113, inclusive, of chapter 27 of the revised statutes are hereby repealed.

SENATE AMENDMENT "A" to S. P. 551, L. D. 1489, Bill, "An Act Relating to Hospitalization of the Mentally Ill."

Amend said Bill by striking out all of the amending clause of section 1 and inserting in place thereof the following:

Sec. 1. R. S., c. 27, §§ 103-A - 103-H additional. Chapter 27 of the revised statutes is hereby amended by adding thereto 8 new sections to be numbered 103-A to 103-H, to read as follows:

Further amend said Bill by renumbering those parts designated "Sec. 103-E" and "Sec. 103-F" to be Sec. 103-G' and Sec. 103-H'

Further amend said Bill by inserting after Sec. 103-D thereof, the following underlined sections:

patient is detained, shall be released within 48 hours after receipt of the request, except that upon application to the judge of probate in the county where the hospital is located, supported by a certification by the superintendent of the hospital that in his opinion such release would be unsafe for the patient or for others, release may be postponed for such period not to exceed 5 days as the judge of probate may determine to be necessary for the commencement of proceedings for a judicial determination pursuant to sections 103-B to 103-D.

The superintendent of the hospital shall provide reasonable means and arrangements for informing involuntary patients of their right to release as provided in this section and for assisting them in making and presenting requests for release. The provisions of this section shall not be available to a patient who has been duly committed by a court or the municipal officers of a town or city.

Sec. 103-F. Detention pending judicial determination. Notwithstanding any other provision of sections 103-A to 103-H, inclusive, no patient with respect to whom proceedings for judicial hospitalization have been commenced shall be released or discharged from a mental hospital during the pendency of such proceedings unless ordered by the judge of probate in the county where the hospital is located upon the application of the patient, or his legal guardian, parent, spouse, adult next of kin or friend, or upon the report of the head of the hospital that the patient may be discharged with safety.'

Further amend said Bill by adding at the end thereof a new section 3, as follows:

"Sec. 3. R. S., c. 27, § 134, repealed and replaced. Section 134 of chapter 27 of the revised statutes is hereby repealed and the following enacted in place thereof:

Sec. 134. Inquiry into cases of alleged unreasonable detention. Any person adjudged insane and committed to either state hospital, or his legal guardian, spouse, adult next of kin or friend, thinking that the patient is unreasonably detained, may apply in writing to any Justice of the Superior Court, in term time or vacation, who shall inquire into the case and summon before him such witnesses as in his judgment may be necessary, and upon such application may vacate such commitment, and if such person was committed under a sentence following conviction for crime and the sentence has not expired, remand him to the proper custody; and if the original sentence has expired, discharge such person. He shall tax costs and shall decide whether they shall be borne by the petitioner or by the State.' "

Name: Reid.

County: Kennebec.

In Senate Chamber

May 18, 1955

READ AND ADOPTED

CHESTER T. WINSLOW,

Secretary.

ANSWER OF THE JUSTICES

To the Honorable Senate of the State of Maine:

In compliance with the provisions of Section 3 of Article VI of the Constitution of Maine, the undersigned Justices of the Supreme Judicial Court, having considered the question submitted by the foregoing Order of the Senate, answer as follows:

The issue here presented is whether or not proposed Senate Amendment "A" to Senate Paper 551, Legislative Document 1489, provides adequate methods by which persons committed as mentally ill under the so-called "Emergency Procedure" therein provided may institute proceedings within the period of restraint to test the necessity of their commitment.

Senate Amendment "A" does in fact provide two prompt and effective methods, by either of which such proceedings may be instituted by the person alleged to be mentally ill or persons acting in his interest. We deem that thereby the constitutional rights of citizens are adequately protected. Accordingly, we answer the submitted question in the affirmative.

Dated at Augusta, Maine, this 20th day of May, 1955.

Respectfully submitted:

RAYMOND FELLOWS

ROBERT B. WILLIAMSON

DONALD W. WEBBER

ALBERT BELIVEAU

WALTER M. TAPLEY, JR.

Justice Frank A. Tirrell authorizes the statement that he concurs in the foregoing answer.

RAYMOND FELLOWS


Summaries of

In re Opinion of Justices

Supreme Judicial Court of Maine
May 18, 1955
117 A.2d 57 (Me. 1955)
Case details for

In re Opinion of Justices

Case Details

Full title:OPINION OF THE JUSTICES OF THE SUPREME JUDICIAL COURT GIVEN UNDER THE…

Court:Supreme Judicial Court of Maine

Date published: May 18, 1955

Citations

117 A.2d 57 (Me. 1955)
151 Me. 24
1955 Me. LEXIS 50

Citing Cases

Shone v. State

In Sleeper, Appellant, 1952, 147 Me. 302, 87 A.2d 115, we recognized that due process of law was applicable…

In re Opinion of Justices

The limitations on release are substantially like those established in Section 171 for the discharge of the…