From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

In re O'Connell

United States Bankruptcy Court, D. Arizona
Oct 29, 2008
No. 4:05-bk-07616-JMM (Bankr. D. Ariz. Oct. 29, 2008)

Opinion

No. 4:05-bk-07616-JMM.

October 29, 2008


MEMORANDUM DECISION


The Debtor, William J. O'Connell, has filed a motion in this closed chapter 7 case, seeking an order requiring certain of his creditors, as well as various credit reporting agencies, to report that there is "no balance due" on certain debts discharged in his chapter 7 proceeding.

This matter was filed as a motion. The court need not reopen the case in order to dispose of this latest motion. See In re Menk, 241 B.R. 896, 904 (9th Cir. BAP 1999).

The relief requested by the Debtor cannot be granted, because there is no statutory or case law which grants the court the power to issue such an order.

The Debtor, understandably, misapprehends the legal effect of a discharge in bankruptcy. The distinction is rather subtle. A discharge does not "pay off" a prior debt, nor change thehistoric fact of an unpaid debt. A bankruptcy discharge does not change an unpaid debt into a "paid" one.

All that a bankruptcy discharge does, in "releasing" a debtor's personal liability is to bar a creditor's right to pursue such in personam mode of enforcing its debt. See Davis v. Aetna Acceptance Co., 293 U.S. 328, 331 (1934); Johnson v. Home State Bank, 501 U.S. 78, 84 (1991); In re Lewis, 506 F.3d 927, 932 (9th Cir. 2007); 11 U.S.C. § 524(a).

But what a debtor cannot escape is his or her own past history of unpaid debt. Those blemishes remain on a debtor's credit record for a period of time, sometimes as long as ten years.

Thus, a creditor's derogatory remarks, to its credit bureaus, is not inaccurate if what it is reporting are simply the facts of non-payment and prior delinquencies. The credit reporting agencies are also, no doubt, picking up and reporting the bankruptcy proceedings and discharge. Those are accurate portraits of an individual debtor's credit history, and of one's legal status in relation to those debts.

Therefore, this court cannot order creditors, or credit reporting agencies, to change their historic payment records of a debtor's accounts from "unpaid" to "paid."

Accordingly, an order will be entered which DENIES the Debtor's motion.

DATED AND SIGNED ABOVE.

Notice Recipients

Recipients of Notice of Electronic Filing:

District/Off: 0970-4 User: mcelroyc Date Created: 10/29/2008 Case: 4:05-bk-07616-JMM Form ID: pdf008 Total: 3 db WILLIAM J. OCONNELL billyoconnell2u@aol.com ust U.S. TRUSTEE USTPRegion14.PX.ECF@USDOJ.GOV tr STANLEY J KARTCHNER ch7trustee@comcast.net TOTAL: 3


Summaries of

In re O'Connell

United States Bankruptcy Court, D. Arizona
Oct 29, 2008
No. 4:05-bk-07616-JMM (Bankr. D. Ariz. Oct. 29, 2008)
Case details for

In re O'Connell

Case Details

Full title:In re: WILLIAM J. O'CONNELL, Chapter 7, Debtor

Court:United States Bankruptcy Court, D. Arizona

Date published: Oct 29, 2008

Citations

No. 4:05-bk-07616-JMM (Bankr. D. Ariz. Oct. 29, 2008)

Citing Cases

Williams v. Rushmore Loan Mgmt. Servs., LLC

See Vogt, 257 B.R. at 71 ("The creditor was under no obligation under the Bankruptcy Code to change the way…

Mortimer v. Bank of Am., N.A.

Several courts, including two in this district involving closely analogous factual situations, have held that…