From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

In re Mun. Derivatives Antitrust Litig.

UNITED STATES JUDICIAL PANEL on MULTIDISTRICT LITIGATION
Aug 18, 2011
MDL No. 1950 (S.D.N.Y. Aug. 18, 2011)

Opinion

MDL No. 1950

08-18-2011

In re: MUNICIPAL DERIVATIVES ANTITRUST LITIGATION


(SEE ATTACHED SCHEDULE)


CONDITIONAL TRANSFER ORDER (CTO-16)

On June 16, 2008, the Panel transferred 2 civil action(s) to the United States District Court for the Southern District of New York for coordinated or consolidated pretrial proceedings pursuant to 28 U.S.C. §1407. See 560 F.Supp.2d 1386 (J.P.M.L. 2008). Since that time, 27 additional action(s) have been transferred to the Southern District of New York. With the consent of that court, all such actions have been assigned to the Honorable Victor Marrero. It appears that the action(s) on this conditional transfer order involve questions of fact that are common to the actions previously transferred to the Southern District of New York and assigned to Judge Marrero. Pursuant to Rule 7.1 of the Rules of Procedure of the United States Judicial Panel on Multidistrict Litigation, the action(s) on the attached schedule are transferred under 28 U.S.C. §1407 to the Southern District of New York for the reasons stated in the order of June 16, 2008, and, with the consent of that court, assigned to the Honorable Victor Marrero.

This order does not become effective until it is filed in the Office of the Clerk of the United States District Court for the Southern District of New York. The transmittal of this order to said Clerk shall be stayed 7 days from the entry thereof. If any party files a notice of opposition with the Clerk of the Panel within this 7-day period, the stay will be continued until further order of the Panel.

FOR THE PANEL:

Jeffery N. Lüthi

Clerk of the Panel

Inasmuch as no objection is pending at this time, the stay is lifted.

CLERK'S OFFICE

UNITED STATES JUDICIAL PANEL ON MULTIDISTRICT LITIGATION

A CERTIFIED COPY RUBY J. KRAHCK, CLERK

BY ____

Deputy Clerk

SCHEDULE CTO-16 - TAG-ALONG ACTIONS

+-------------------------------------------------------------------------+ ¦DIST ¦DIV. ¦C.A.NO. ¦CASE CAPTION ¦ +-------------------------------------------------------------------------¦ ¦CALIFORNIA NORTHERN ¦ +-------------------------------------------------------------------------¦ ¦ ¦ ¦ ¦East Bay Delta Housing &Finance Agency v. Bank of¦ ¦CAN ¦3 ¦11-03651 ¦ ¦ ¦ ¦ ¦ ¦America N.A. et al ¦ +-------------------------------------------------------------------------+


Summaries of

In re Mun. Derivatives Antitrust Litig.

UNITED STATES JUDICIAL PANEL on MULTIDISTRICT LITIGATION
Aug 18, 2011
MDL No. 1950 (S.D.N.Y. Aug. 18, 2011)
Case details for

In re Mun. Derivatives Antitrust Litig.

Case Details

Full title:In re: MUNICIPAL DERIVATIVES ANTITRUST LITIGATION

Court:UNITED STATES JUDICIAL PANEL on MULTIDISTRICT LITIGATION

Date published: Aug 18, 2011

Citations

MDL No. 1950 (S.D.N.Y. Aug. 18, 2011)