From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

In re Mott

Supreme Court of New Jersey
Apr 12, 2006
186 N.J. 367 (N.J. 2006)

Opinion

April 12, 2006


ORDER

The Disciplinary Review Board having filed with the Court its decision in DRB 05-318, concluding that JOEL A. MOTT, III, of WOODBURY, who was admitted to the bar of this State in 1979, should be reprimanded for violating RPC 1.7(b) (representation of a client when the representation was materially limited by the lawyer's own interests, absent a reasonable belief that the representation would not be adversely affected and absent the client's consent after full disclosure of the circumstances and consultation), RPC 1.8(a) (business transaction with a client), N.J. Advisory Comm. on Prof'l Ethics Opinion 532, 107 N.J.L.J. 544 (1984) (attorney who creates another business must keep the business and the law firm "entirely separate"), and N.J. Advisory Comm. on Prof'l Ethics Opinion 682, 143 N.J.L.J. 454 (1996) (prohibits attorneys from participating in a bar-related title insurance company owned and managed by lawyers, who do not receive compensation for their services, but do retain a portion of the title insurance premium as part of their fee for representing the buyer), and good cause appearing;

It is ORDERED that JOEL A. MOTT, III is hereby reprimanded; and it is further

ORDERED that the entire record of this matter be made a permanent part of respondent's file as an attorney at law of this State; and it is further

ORDERED that respondent reimburse the Disciplinary Oversight Committee for appropriate administrative costs and actual expenses incurred in the prosecution of this matter, as provided in Rule 1:20-17.


Summaries of

In re Mott

Supreme Court of New Jersey
Apr 12, 2006
186 N.J. 367 (N.J. 2006)
Case details for

In re Mott

Case Details

Full title:IN THE MATTER OF JOEL A. MOTT, III, AN ATTORNEY AT LAW (ATTORNEY NO…

Court:Supreme Court of New Jersey

Date published: Apr 12, 2006

Citations

186 N.J. 367 (N.J. 2006)
895 A.2d 1128

Citing Cases

In re Agrait

In re Berkowitz, 136 N.J. 148 (1994). Accord In re Mott, 186 N.J. 367 (2006) (attorney prepared, on behalf of…

In re Woitkowski

In support of its position that respondent entered into business transactions with his clients, the OAE…