From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

J.P. Morgan Investment Management Inc. v. United States Trustee

United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit
Jul 24, 1996
90 F.3d 408 (9th Cir. 1996)

Opinion

No. 95-36189

Argued June 3, 1996 Seattle, Washington Submission Deferred June 4, 1996 Resubmitted July 16, 1996

Filed July 24, 1996

Donna C. Willard, Willoughby Willard, Anchorage, Alaska; Arnon D. Siegel, Davis, Polk Wardwell, Washington, D.C., for the appellants.

Rebecca S. Copeland, Koval Featherly, Anchorage, Alaska; Barbara L. Franklin, Assistant United States Trustee, Anchorage, Alaska, for the appellees.

Appeal from the Ninth Circuit Bankruptcy Appellate Panel. Meyers, Jellen, and Naugle, Judges, Presiding.

BAP No. AK-95-01339-MeJeN.

Before: James R. Browning, Eugene A. Wright, and Thomas G. Nelson, Circuit Judges.


The opinion of the Bankruptcy Appellate Panel is AFFIRMED for the reasons given by that panel.

J.P. Morgan Inv. Management, Inc. v. United States Trustee (In re Martech USA, Inc.), 188 B.R. 847 (9th Cir. B.A.P. 1995).


Summaries of

J.P. Morgan Investment Management Inc. v. United States Trustee

United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit
Jul 24, 1996
90 F.3d 408 (9th Cir. 1996)
Case details for

J.P. Morgan Investment Management Inc. v. United States Trustee

Case Details

Full title:In re: MARTECH USA, INC., Debtor. J.P. MORGAN INVESTMENT MANAGEMENT, INC.…

Court:United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit

Date published: Jul 24, 1996

Citations

90 F.3d 408 (9th Cir. 1996)

Citing Cases

Riemer & Braunstein LLP v. DeGiacomo (In re A&E 128 N. Corp.)

Thus, the order before us is final for purposes of appeal, and we have jurisdiction.See J.P. Morgan Inv.…

In re Stockton

A court abuses its discretion if it relies upon an erroneous interpretation of the law. J.P. Morgan Inv.…