holding that "[a]mbiguity exists if the contract contains provisions or language of doubtful or conflicting meaning" and courts may consider extrinsic evidence if contract is ambiguous
Summary of this case from Horizon Personal Communications, Inc. v. Sprint Corp.No. 93,325.
January 13, 2006.
Appeal from Franklin.
Decision without published opinion. Affirmed in part, reversed in part, and remanded with directions.
holding that "[a]mbiguity exists if the contract contains provisions or language of doubtful or conflicting meaning" and courts may consider extrinsic evidence if contract is ambiguous
Summary of this case from Horizon Personal Communications, Inc. v. Sprint Corp.Full title:IN RE MARRIAGE OF MOHR
Court:Court of Appeals of Kansas
Date published: Jan 13, 2006
Under Kansas law, plaintiff may appeal the District Court's judgment in his divorce proceeding, including the…
Horizon Personal Communications, Inc. v. Sprint Corp.The Court may consider extrinsic evidence because section 12.2 is of "doubtful meaning." In re Marriage of…