From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

In re Leotti

Supreme Court of New Jersey.
Jul 3, 2014
218 N.J. 6 (N.J. 2014)

Summary

ordering disbarment of attorney who diverted to personal accounts client payments to his law firm for legal fees in several matters, In re Leotti, DRB No. 13–344 (Apr. 11, 2014) (slip op. at 4–7)

Summary of this case from In re Sigman

Opinion

2014-07-3

In the Matter of Darren P. LEOTTI, an Attorney at Law (Attorney No. 009371991).


ORDER

The Disciplinary Review Board having filed with the Court its decision in DRB 13–344, concluding on the record certified to the Board pursuant to Rule 1:20–4(f) (default by respondent) that DARREN P. LEOTTI of FLEMINGTON, who was admitted to the bar of this State in 1991, and who has been temporarily suspended from the practice of law since April 16, 2013, should be disbarred for violating RPC 1.15(a) (failure to safeguard property of clients or third persons by knowingly misappropriating law firm funds), and the principles of In re Siegel, 133 N.J. 162, 627 A.2d 156 (1993);

And DARREN P. LEOTTI having failed to appear on the Order directing him to show cause why he should not be disbarred or otherwise disciplined;

And good cause appearing;

It is ORDERED that DARREN P. LEOTTI be disbarred, effective immediately, and that his name be stricken from the roll of attorneys;

ORDERED that DARREN P. LEOTTI be and hereby is permanently restrained and enjoined from practicing law; and it is further

ORDERED that DARREN P. LEOTTI comply with Rule 1:20–20 dealing with disbarred attorneys; and it is further

ORDERED that the entire record of this matter be made a permanent part of respondent's file as an attorney at law of this State; and it is further

ORDERED that respondent reimburse the Disciplinary Oversight Committee for appropriate administrative costs and actual expenses incurred in the prosecution of this matter, as provided in Rule 1:20–17.


Summaries of

In re Leotti

Supreme Court of New Jersey.
Jul 3, 2014
218 N.J. 6 (N.J. 2014)

ordering disbarment of attorney who diverted to personal accounts client payments to his law firm for legal fees in several matters, In re Leotti, DRB No. 13–344 (Apr. 11, 2014) (slip op. at 4–7)

Summary of this case from In re Sigman
Case details for

In re Leotti

Case Details

Full title:In the Matter of Darren P. LEOTTI, an Attorney at Law (Attorney No…

Court:Supreme Court of New Jersey.

Date published: Jul 3, 2014

Citations

218 N.J. 6 (N.J. 2014)
92 A.3d 1166

Citing Cases

In re Speck

Id. at 19-20, 22. The Court agreed with these members and disbarred the attorney. See also In re Malanqa, 227…

In re Sigman

In the wake of Siegel and Greenberg, the Court has adopted the DRB's recommendation of disbarment in several…