From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

In re Larkins

Supreme Court of New Jersey.
Feb 14, 2014
217 N.J. 20 (N.J. 2014)

Opinion

2014-02-14

In the Matter of Daniel G. LARKINS, an Attorney at Law (Attorney No. 037641983).


ORDER

The Disciplinary Review Board having filed with the Court its decision in DRB 13–155, concluding on the record certified to the Board pursuant to Rule 1:20–4(f) (default by respondent), that DANIEL G. LARKINS, formerly of HACKENSACK, who was admitted to the bar of this State in 1983, should be reprimanded for violating RPC 8.1(b) (failure to cooperate with an ethics investigation), and good cause appearing;

It is ORDERED that DANIEL G. LARKINS is hereby reprimanded; and it is further

ORDERED that the entire record of this matter be made a permanent part of respondent's file as an attorney at law of this State; and it is further

ORDERED that respondent reimburse the Disciplinary Oversight Committee for appropriate administrative costs and actual expenses incurred in the prosecution of this matter, as provided in Rule 1:20–17.


Summaries of

In re Larkins

Supreme Court of New Jersey.
Feb 14, 2014
217 N.J. 20 (N.J. 2014)
Case details for

In re Larkins

Case Details

Full title:In the Matter of Daniel G. LARKINS, an Attorney at Law (Attorney No…

Court:Supreme Court of New Jersey.

Date published: Feb 14, 2014

Citations

217 N.J. 20 (N.J. 2014)
84 A.3d 262

Citing Cases

In re Wright

See, e.g., In re Larkins, 217 N.J. 220 (2014) (default; attorney did not reply to the ethics investigator's…

In re Vaccaro

See, e.g., In re Larkins, 217 N.J. 20 (2014) (default; attorney did not reply to the ethics investigator's…