From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

In re Landesman v. Whitton

Supreme Court of the State of New York. Dutchess County
Oct 2, 2006
13 Misc. 3d 1216 (N.Y. Sup. Ct. 2006)

Summary

In Landesman v. Whitton, 13 Misc.3d 1216(A), 2006 WL 2808070 (Supreme Court, Dutchess County, Dickerson, J., October 2, 2006), aff'd.

Summary of this case from Westchester Joint Water Works v. Assessor of the City of Rye

Opinion

October 2, 2006.


Process — Service of Process — Tax Certiorari Proceeding.


Summaries of

In re Landesman v. Whitton

Supreme Court of the State of New York. Dutchess County
Oct 2, 2006
13 Misc. 3d 1216 (N.Y. Sup. Ct. 2006)

In Landesman v. Whitton, 13 Misc.3d 1216(A), 2006 WL 2808070 (Supreme Court, Dutchess County, Dickerson, J., October 2, 2006), aff'd.

Summary of this case from Westchester Joint Water Works v. Assessor of the City of Rye

In Matter of Landesman v Whitton (13 Misc 3d 1216[A], 2006 NY Slip Op 51847[U] [Sup Ct, Dutchess County, Oct. 2, 2006, Dickerson, J.], aff'd 46 AD3d 827 [2d Dept 2007]), the petitioner had served the Poughkeepsie School District, but had not directly served the Superintendent of the district.

Summary of this case from In re Michael F.X. Ryan

In Matter of Landesman v Whitton (13 Misc 3d 1216[A], 2006 NY Slip Op 51847[U] [Sup Ct, Dutchess County, Oct. 2, 2006, Dickerson, J.], affd 46 AD3d 827 [2d Dept 2007]), the petitioner had mailed the petition to the Poughkeepsie School District, but not the superintendent of the district directly.

Summary of this case from Wyeth Holdings v. Assessor
Case details for

In re Landesman v. Whitton

Case Details

Full title:Matter of Landesman v. Whitton

Court:Supreme Court of the State of New York. Dutchess County

Date published: Oct 2, 2006

Citations

13 Misc. 3d 1216 (N.Y. Sup. Ct. 2006)
2006 N.Y. Slip Op. 51847

Citing Cases

Wyeth Holdings v. Assessor

Notably, RPTL 708 (3) is a notice statute, not a service statute, since by its terms those entities noticed…

Westchester Joint Water Works v. Assessor of the City of Rye

Here, the District, through an employee, affirms that in none of the tax years at issue did it receive notice…