From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

In re Lance

United States Court of Appeals, Fifth Circuit
Jan 14, 1980
610 F.2d 228 (5th Cir. 1980)

Opinion

No. 80-7028.

January 14, 1980.

Powell, Goldstein, Frazer Murphy, Atlanta, Ga., Janis, Schuelke Wechsler, Washington, D.C., for petitioner.

Marvin R. Loewy, U.S. Dept. of Justice, Washington, D.C., for Dept. of Justice.

On Petition for Writ of Mandamus to the United States District Court for the Northern District of Georgia; Charles J. Moye, Jr., Chief Judge.

Before GOLDBERG, RUBIN and POLITZ, Circuit Judges.


Appellate Review of the conduct of criminal proceedings should usually be postponed until after final judgment has been rendered by the trial court. See Will v. United States, 389 U.S. 90, 96, 88 S.Ct. 269, 274, 19 L.Ed.2d 305, 310 (1967) (in which review was sought by the government); cf. Helstoski v. Meanor, 442 U.S. 500, 99 S.Ct. 2445, 61 L.Ed.2d 30 (1979) (denying a writ of mandamus to a defendant who had a remedy by appeal).

All parties agree that there is no precedent for staying the trial. Having carefully considered the motion and the consequences of granting as well as those of denying it, both in the present case and as a precedent for this circuit, we conclude that it should be DENIED.


Summaries of

In re Lance

United States Court of Appeals, Fifth Circuit
Jan 14, 1980
610 F.2d 228 (5th Cir. 1980)
Case details for

In re Lance

Case Details

Full title:IN RE T. BERTRAM LANCE, PETITIONER

Court:United States Court of Appeals, Fifth Circuit

Date published: Jan 14, 1980

Citations

610 F.2d 228 (5th Cir. 1980)

Citing Cases

Chilivis v. Securities Exchange Commission

The controversy has spurred a significant amount of litigation. See Federal Election Commission v. Lance, 635…