From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

In re Kezzia T

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department
Jun 1, 2000
273 A.D.2d 13 (N.Y. App. Div. 2000)

Opinion

June 1, 2000.

Order of disposition, Family Court, New York County (Sheldon Rand, J.), entered on or about April 12, 1999, which adjudicated appellant a juvenile delinquent, upon a fact-finding determination that appellant committed an act which, if committed by an adult, would constitute the crime of obstructing governmental administration in the second degree, and placing her on probation for a period of 18 months, unanimously reversed, on the law, without costs, and the petition dismissed.

Randy Hertz, for appellant.

Helen P. Brown, Presentment Agency.

Before: Williams, J.P., Tom, Mazzarelli, Rubin, Friedman, JJ.


As the presentment agency correctly concedes, the evidence adduced at the fact-finding hearing was legally insufficient. Appellant's initial untruthfulness about the presence of a weapon inside the apartment, followed by her refusal to disclose its location, do not satisfy the elements of obstructing governmental administration (Penal Law § 195.05; People v. Case, 42 N.Y.2d 98, 102).

THIS CONSTITUTES THE DECISION AND ORDER OF SUPREME COURT, APPELLATE DIVISION, FIRST DEPARTMENT.


Summaries of

In re Kezzia T

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department
Jun 1, 2000
273 A.D.2d 13 (N.Y. App. Div. 2000)
Case details for

In re Kezzia T

Case Details

Full title:IN RE KEZZIA T., A PERSON ALLEGED TO BE A JUVENILE DELINQUENT, APPELLANT

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department

Date published: Jun 1, 2000

Citations

273 A.D.2d 13 (N.Y. App. Div. 2000)
709 N.Y.S.2d 401

Citing Cases

Uzoukwu v. City of N.Y.

Thus, “purely verbal interference may not satisfy the ‘physical component under Penal Law § 195.05.’ ” In re…

Gonzalez v. City of New York

In doing so, although she was loud and sought to walk away, Plaintiff did not engage in any physical act that…