From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

In re Kenitra, Inc.

United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit
Aug 19, 1986
797 F.2d 790 (9th Cir. 1986)

Summary

expanding Shamrock to cover Bankruptcy Code cases

Summary of this case from In re Bristol Industries

Opinion

No. 85-4068.

Argued and Submitted July 7, 1986.

Decided August 19, 1986.

David A. Foraker and Brent G. Summers, Greene Markley, P.C., Portland, Or., for plaintiff-appellant.

Joan L. Volpert and Christopher L. Reive, Martin, Bischoff, Templeton, Briggs Ericsson, Lory R. Lybeck, Schwabe, Williamson, Wyatt, Moore Roberts, and Jack Schwartz, Newcomb, Sabin, Schwartz Landsverk, Portland, Or., for defendants-appellees.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Oregon.

Before WALLACE, FERGUSON and NORRIS, Circuit Judges.


Plaintiff Robert K. Morrow, Inc., trustee for the debtor, Kenitra, Inc., appeals the district court's affirmance of the bankruptcy court's dismissal of adversary proceedings against defendants Agri-Beef Co. and Independent Grain Co., and partial dismissal of an adversary proceeding against Waldrip Bros. We affirm.

I.

More than ninety days before creditors filed an involuntary bankruptcy petition against the debtor, the debtor gave checks to the defendants as payments on existing debts. The banks on which the checks were drawn honored them within ninety days of the date of the filing. The trustee filed adversary proceedings to avoid the payments as preferences under 11 U.S.C. § 547(b). The proceeding against Waldrip Bros. involved one check given prior to the ninety-day period but honored within it, and one check given and honored within the period.

The bankruptcy court granted summary judgment for Agri-Beef and Independent Grain, and partial summary judgment for Waldrip Bros. on that part of the claim involving the check given prior to the ninety-day period. The district court consolidated the appeals and affirmed. The trustee filed a timely appeal.

II.

A debtor's payment by check on an existing debt, presented to the bank within a reasonable time and honored by the bank, is deemed made at the time the debtor gave the check to the creditor. Shamrock Golf Co. v. Richcraft, Inc., 680 F.2d 645 (9th Cir. 1982); In re Walker Industrial Auctioneers, Inc., 45 B.R. 452 (Bankr.Or. 1984) (applying Shamrock Golf). Payments made on existing debts within ninety days of the filing of the petition are avoidable as preferences. 11 U.S.C. § 547(b). The payments here were not avoidable under section 547: The debtor gave the checks to the defendants before the ninety-day preference period started, the defendants presented the checks to the bank within a reasonable time, and the bank honored the checks.

The bankruptcy proceeding in Shamrock Golf was governed by the 1898 Bankruptcy Act, but the case also referred to the 1978 Bankruptcy Code. There were no changes in the 1978 Code or in the 1984 Bankruptcy Code that suggest a reason to depart from the rule in Shamrock Golf.

The defendants request sanctions under Fed.R.App.P. 38 for a frivolous appeal. We decline to impose sanctions. However, on this appeal the trustee challenged, with little hope of succeeding, a well-settled Ninth Circuit rule. This circumstance may affect the bankruptcy or district court's determination of the trustee's fees for this litigation.

AFFIRMED.


Summaries of

In re Kenitra, Inc.

United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit
Aug 19, 1986
797 F.2d 790 (9th Cir. 1986)

expanding Shamrock to cover Bankruptcy Code cases

Summary of this case from In re Bristol Industries
Case details for

In re Kenitra, Inc.

Case Details

Full title:IN RE KENITRA, INC. ROBERT K. MORROW, INC., PLAINTIFF-APPELLANT, v…

Court:United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit

Date published: Aug 19, 1986

Citations

797 F.2d 790 (9th Cir. 1986)

Citing Cases

Kupetz v. Elaine Monroe Associates, Inc.

Id. at 646 (quoting 124 Cong.Rec. 32,400 (1978), reprinted in 1978 U.S.Code Cong. Admin.News 6436, 6457…

In re Nucorp Energy, Inc.

McKenzie v. Irving Trust Co., 323 U.S. 365, 370, 65 S.Ct. 405, 408, 89 L.Ed. 305 (1945). The cases in this…