From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

In re Kemp; Kemp v. Division of Family Serv

Supreme Court of Delaware
Nov 15, 2000
765 A.2d 952 (Del. 2000)

Summary

In Kemp v. Division No. 241, 255 Ill. 213, an injunction had been issued restraining the union from conspiring to procure the discharge of plaintiff's other employees, because they did not belong to the union.

Summary of this case from M. Ward Co. v. United Employees

Opinion

No. 175, 2000.

November 15, 2000.

Appeal from Family Court, New Castle County, 99-10-04TN.

AFFIRMED.


Unpublished Opinion is below.

IN THE MATTER OF: THOMAS STUART KEMP aka THOMAS DAVID MURROW, A MINOR CHILD: STUART E. KEMP, Respondent Below, Appellant, v. DIVISION OF FAMILY SERVICES, Petitioner Below, Appellee. No. 175, 2000. In the Supreme Court of the State of Delaware. Submitted: October 31, 2000. Decided: November 15, 2000.

Court Below: Family Court of the State of Delaware, in and for New Castle County, File No. 99-10-04TN.

Before VEASEY, Chief Justice, WALSH and STEELE Justices.

ORDER

This 15th day of November, the Court having carefully considered the decision and judgment of the Family Court dated March 22, 2000, together with the briefs filed by the parties, has determined as follows:

To the extent that: (a) the issues raised on appeal are factual, the record evidence supports the trial judge's factual findings; (b) the errors alleged on appeal are attributed to an abuse of discretion, the record does not support those assertions; (c) the issues raised on appeal are legal, they are controlled by settled Delaware law, which was properly applied.

NOW, THEREFORE, IT IS ORDERED that the judgment of the Family Court is AFFIRMED.

BY THE COURT:

/s/ Myron T. Steele Justice


Summaries of

In re Kemp; Kemp v. Division of Family Serv

Supreme Court of Delaware
Nov 15, 2000
765 A.2d 952 (Del. 2000)

In Kemp v. Division No. 241, 255 Ill. 213, an injunction had been issued restraining the union from conspiring to procure the discharge of plaintiff's other employees, because they did not belong to the union.

Summary of this case from M. Ward Co. v. United Employees
Case details for

In re Kemp; Kemp v. Division of Family Serv

Case Details

Full title:IN THE MATTER OF: THOMAS STUART KEMP aka THOMAS DAVID MURROW, A MINOR…

Court:Supreme Court of Delaware

Date published: Nov 15, 2000

Citations

765 A.2d 952 (Del. 2000)

Citing Cases

Amer. Foundries v. Tri-City Council

Crim. Code, c. 38, §§ 46, 158, 159; Barnes Co. v. Typographical Union, 232 Ill. 424, 431, 434; O'Brien v.…

Walgreen Co. v. Murphy

public policy becomes unnecessary where the statute, as here, specifically declares the public policy…