From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

In re John E. Olczyk, v. Verizon

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Third Department
Oct 19, 2006
33 A.D.3d 1109 (N.Y. App. Div. 2006)

Summary

adopting Initial Decision, 2006 WL 995853, at *64

Summary of this case from Popowsky v. Pennsylvania Public Util

Opinion

No. 99643.

October 19, 2006.

Appeal from a decision of the Workers' Compensation Board, filed March 22, 2005, which, inter alia, ruled that the medical reports of the independent medical examiner were properly precluded.

Before Crew III, J.P., Carpinello, Mugglin and Lahtinen, JJ , concur.


The self-insured employer arranged for an independent medical examiner to examine claimant. The employer's counsel conceded at the hearing that this physician's report was not in the Workers' Compensation Board's file, though an addendum to the report was filed. A Workers' Compensation Law Judge precluded the report and addendum for noncompliance with the requirements of Workers' Compensation Law § 137, and authorized treatment for claimant. The employer appealed to the Board, which upheld the decision, resulting in this appeal.

We affirm. Because the report was not filed with the Board within 10 business days after the examination, it was properly precluded ( see Workers' Compensation Law § 137; 12 NYCRR 300.2 [d] [3], [9], [11]; accord Matter of Jarek v McCall, 268 AD2d 654, 655; Matter of Klein v Regan, 165 AD2d 944, 945). The addendum was also properly precluded, as it referred to and relied on the original report.

Ordered that the decision is affirmed, without costs.


Summaries of

In re John E. Olczyk, v. Verizon

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Third Department
Oct 19, 2006
33 A.D.3d 1109 (N.Y. App. Div. 2006)

adopting Initial Decision, 2006 WL 995853, at *64

Summary of this case from Popowsky v. Pennsylvania Public Util
Case details for

In re John E. Olczyk, v. Verizon

Case Details

Full title:In the Matter of the Claim of JOHN E. OLCZYK, Respondent, v. VERIZON NEW…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Third Department

Date published: Oct 19, 2006

Citations

33 A.D.3d 1109 (N.Y. App. Div. 2006)
2006 N.Y. Slip Op. 7554
822 N.Y.S.2d 338

Citing Cases

Popowsky v. Pennsylvania Public Util

The Commission majority had rejected conditions relating to service quality assurance since the record…

Harris v. Dep't of Envtl. Prot.

Here, there is no indication in the record that Rose's July 2020 report on permanency and SLU was filed with…