From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

In re J.M.T

Court of Appeals of Texas, Waco
Sep 23, 1999
999 S.W.2d 562 (Tex. App. 1999)

Opinion

No. 10-98-286-CV

August 19, 1999. Rehearing Overruled September 23, 1999.

Appeal from the 220th District Court, Bosque County, James E. Morgan, J.

Mark K. Morris, Waco, Lori Harkins, Hewitt, for appellant.

Steve Robertson, Robertson Robertson, Clifton, for appellee.

Before: Chief Justice DAVIS, Justice VANCE and Justice GRAY.


MEMORANDUM OPINION


This Court does not have jurisdiction of this appeal because a final judgment has not been signed. Accordingly we dismiss the appeal for lack of jurisdiction.

Only the procedural facts related to the signing of the judgment are relevant to the disposition of this appeal. They are as follows:

1. A judgment entitled "Order of Termination" was signed June 10, 1998.

2. A second judgment entitled "Reformed Order of Termination" was signed on July 1, 1998.

3. On the face of the Reformed Order of Termination is the following hand written notation: "7-1-98 Set Aside later same date" which is signed by the trial court.

4. No judgment signed subsequent to July 1, 1998 appears in the record before this Court. There is nothing in the record to indicate that the judgment signed June 10, 1998 was revived.

By signing the second judgment during his plenary power the first judgment was vitiated. It is as if the trial court never signed the first judgment. There is no question that the trial court was fully within the period of its plenary power to sign a modified or reformed judgment when it signed the second judgment. Likewise, there is no question that the trial court had the power to "set aside" the second judgment. However, without a written order reviving the first judgment, it remained as if it had never been signed. Because another judgment has not been signed since the July 1, 1998 judgment was set aside, there is no final appealable judgment of the, trial court from which an appeal can be taken. Wang v. Hsu 899 S.W.2d 409 (Tex.App. — Houston [14th Dist.] 1995, writ denied).

Accordingly, this appeal is dismissed for lack of jurisdiction.


Summaries of

In re J.M.T

Court of Appeals of Texas, Waco
Sep 23, 1999
999 S.W.2d 562 (Tex. App. 1999)
Case details for

In re J.M.T

Case Details

Full title:In the Interest of J.M.T., a child

Court:Court of Appeals of Texas, Waco

Date published: Sep 23, 1999

Citations

999 S.W.2d 562 (Tex. App. 1999)

Citing Cases

Key Finan. v. Prio. Serv.

"A judgment that has been vacated has no legal effect" and "the matter stands precisely as if there had been…

Harrison v. TDCJ-ID

That is what this court has done before in identical circumstances. See In re J.M.T., 999 S.W.2d 562…