Opinion
No. 13-10-00078-CR
Delivered and filed February 24, 2010. DO NOT PUBLISH. See Tex. R. App. P. 47.2(b)
On Petition for Writ of Mandamus.
Before Justices RODRIGUEZ, GARZA, and BENAVIDES.
MEMORANDUM OPINION
Relator, Jesse (Jesus) Soliz, pro se, filed a petition for writ of mandamus in the above cause on February 19, 2010, through which he seeks (1) to compel the trial court to set aside its order denying relator's motion for nunc pro tunc judgment; and (2) to compel the trial court to conduct a hearing on relator's motion for nunc pro tunc judgment and to permit relator's appearance at that hearing. The Court, having examined and fully considered the petition for writ of mandamus, is of the opinion that relator has not shown himself entitled to the relief sought. Accordingly, the petition for writ of mandamus is DENIED. See Tex. R. App. P. 52.8(a).
Relator contends, generally, that the sentences imposed by his judgments in three causes should run concurrently rather than consecutively. These three causes have been previously presented to this Court. See generally Soliz v. State, No. 13-03-00473-CR, 2003 Tex. App. LEXIS 7383 (Tex. App.-Corpus Christi Aug. 28, 2003, no pet.) (per curiam) (mem. op. not designated for publication) (dismissing an appeal by request of appellant); Soliz v. State, No. 13-01-00540-CR, 2002 Tex. App. LEXIS 2456 (Tex. App.-Corpus Christi Apr. 4, 2002, no pet.) (per curiam) (mem. op. not designated for publication) (dismissing an attempted appeal from an order denying an application for writ of habeas corpus); Soliz v. State, 785 S.W.2d 438 (Tex. App.-Corpus Christi 1990, no pet.) (affirming a conviction for felony burglary of a habitation).