From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

In re Interrogatories

Supreme Court of Colorado. En Banc
Oct 14, 1940
106 P.2d 464 (Colo. 1940)

Opinion

No. 14,821.

Answers filed October 14, 1940.

In re interrogatories by the Governor concerning the status of employees in county welfare departments.

1. CIVIL SERVICE — Employees of County Departments of Public Welfare. Employees in the county department of public welfare of any county, as provided by chapter 5, Session Laws Second Extraordinary Session of 1936, are not state employees in the classified civil service within the meaning of section 13, article XII, of the state Constitution.

2. Welfare Department — Employees in Counties. Constitutional jurisdiction may be conferred on the state department of public welfare to provide for the retention and promotion of employees of the county departments of public welfare on the basis of merit and fitness.

Original Proceeding.

Mr. BYRON G. ROGERS, Attorney General, Mr. JOSEPH D. ISKOW, Assistant, appearing for the Governor.

Mr. MALCOLM LINDSEY, Mr. WAYNE D. WILLIAMS, Mr. J. FREDERICK SCHNEIDER, Mr. WILLIAM L. COHN, Mr. THORNTON H. THOMAS, JR., amici curiae.


HIS Excellency, the Honorable Ralph L. Carr, governor of the state of Colorado, has requested this court to answer three interrogatories.

The first interrogatory is as follows:

"First: Are all or any of the employees in the county departments of public welfare state employees in the classified civil service as provided by article XII, section 13 of the Colorado Constitution?"

No, the employees in the county department of public welfare of any county, as now provided for by chapter 5, S.L. Second Extraordinary Session 1936, whether the county be the City and County of Denver or any of the other sixty-two counties, are not state employees in the classified civil service within the meaning of section 13 in article XII of the Colorado Constitution.

The second interrogatory is as follows:

"Second: If the court holds that all or any of the employees of the county departments of public welfare, including all or any of the employees of the welfare department of the City and County of Denver, are not employees in the state classified civil service as provided by article XII, section 13 of the Colorado Constitution, has the state department of public welfare the constitutional jurisdiction to provide for the selection, retention and promotion of all such employees on a basis of merit and fitness?"

Yes, constitutionally such jurisdiction may be conferred. Whether it has been is a question not considered because not included in the interrogatory.

The foregoing answers to the first and second interrogatories make unnecessary an answer to the third, which is as follows:

"Third: If the court holds that all or any of the persons so employed in the county departments of public welfare are under the jurisdiction of the State Civil Service Commission, will that holding apply to the City and County of Denver, within the purview of the Twentieth Amendment to the Colorado Constitution?"

MR. JUSTICE FRANCIS E. BOUCK dissents as to the answer to the second interrogatory.


Summaries of

In re Interrogatories

Supreme Court of Colorado. En Banc
Oct 14, 1940
106 P.2d 464 (Colo. 1940)
Case details for

In re Interrogatories

Case Details

Full title:IN RE INTERROGATORIES BY THE GOVERNOR

Court:Supreme Court of Colorado. En Banc

Date published: Oct 14, 1940

Citations

106 P.2d 464 (Colo. 1940)
106 P.2d 464

Citing Cases

MacNeill, v. Wood

e Supreme Court of the State of Washington had for decision the question whether or not county employees of…

Gilman v. State of Colorado

Cf. In re Interrogatories by Governor, 106 Colo. 475, 106 P.2d 464 (1940) (employees in the county…