From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

In re Ingalls

U.S.
Mar 23, 1891
139 U.S. 548 (1891)

Opinion

ORIGINAL.

No number.

Submitted March 16, 1891. Decided March 23, 1891.

No application to this court for a writ of error will be entertained, except when a Justice of this Court, upon consideration of the record, has deemed it proper, under special circumstances, to endorse thereon a request that counsel be permitted to proceed in that way.

Mr. de Lagnel Berier for petitioners submitted on his brief. Mr. Edward D. McCarthy also filed a brief for petitioners. Mr. George W. Van Slyck for Elizabeth A.L. Hyatt, opposing.


THE case is stated in the opinion.


This is an application for a writ of error made to the court in session, under the apprehension on the part of counsel that it was directed to be so presented. We have, therefore, considered it, with the result that the writ must be denied. Dale Tile Mfg. Co. v. Hyatt, 125 U.S. 46; Walter A. Wood Co. v. Skinner, ante, 293.

We wish it to be distinctly understood that in future no such application will be entertained, except when a Justice of this Court, upon consideration of the record, has deemed it proper under special circumstances to endorse thereon a request that counsel be permitted to proceed in that way.

Writ refused.


Summaries of

In re Ingalls

U.S.
Mar 23, 1891
139 U.S. 548 (1891)
Case details for

In re Ingalls

Case Details

Full title:In re INGALLS, Petitioner

Court:U.S.

Date published: Mar 23, 1891

Citations

139 U.S. 548 (1891)

Citing Cases

Howe Scale Co. v. Wyckoff, Seamans c

Mr. Henry D. Donnelly and Mr. Edmund Wetmore, with whom Mr. William W. Dodge and Mr. Archibald Cox were on…

Donnell v. Herring-Hall-Marvin Safe Co.

The name "Hall" having been so long identified with the safe business as to acquire a secondary meaning, the…