From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

In re Hunt

Circuit Court of Appeals, Seventh Circuit
Nov 17, 1933
67 F.2d 998 (7th Cir. 1933)

Opinion

No. 4936.

November 17, 1933.

Appeal from the District Court of the United States for the Northern District of Illinois, Eastern Division; George A. Carpenter, Judge.

Frederic Burnham, David F. Rosenthal, and Orville W. Lee, all of Chicago, Ill., for appellant.

Lloyd A. Faxon and Harry F. Wiggins, both of Chicago, Ill., for appellee.

Before ALSCHULER, EVANS, and SPARKS, Circuit Judges.


The only material difference in the questions presented in this case and those presented in No. 4899, In re Edward W. Skorcz, Bankrupt, Trustees System Reinco Company v. Edward W. Skorcz, 67 F.2d 187, decided by this court on June 24, 1933, is that in the case at bar, bankrupt had already secured his discharge, while in the Skorcz Case, bankrupt's petition for a discharge was pending. The distinction we think can make no difference, and the order of the District Court in the instant case is affirmed on the authority of the decision in the Skorcz case and the cases therein cited.


Summaries of

In re Hunt

Circuit Court of Appeals, Seventh Circuit
Nov 17, 1933
67 F.2d 998 (7th Cir. 1933)
Case details for

In re Hunt

Case Details

Full title:In re William HUNT, Bankrupt. LOCAL LOAN CO., Appellant, v. William HUNT…

Court:Circuit Court of Appeals, Seventh Circuit

Date published: Nov 17, 1933

Citations

67 F.2d 998 (7th Cir. 1933)

Citing Cases

In re Innis

Thereafter the protection of the right granted her is a matter for her care and attention. In this respect…

In re Cox

A court of bankruptcy is essentially a court of equity and has jurisdiction of a bill ancillary to an…