From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

In re Hopkins

TEXAS COURT OF APPEALS, THIRD DISTRICT, AT AUSTIN
Dec 12, 2017
NO. 03-17-00429-CV (Tex. App. Dec. 12, 2017)

Opinion

NO. 03-17-00429-CV

12-12-2017

In re Jermaine Hopkins


ON MOTION FOR REHEARING

ORIGINAL PROCEEDING FROM TRAVIS COUNTY

MEMORANDUM OPINION

We withdraw our opinion of September 20, 2017, and substitute this opinion in its place. We deny the motion for rehearing.

Relator Jermaine Hopkins contends the trial judge erred in denying Hopkins's motion to compel discovery. Based on the record, the supplemented record, and the issues presented, we conclude Hopkins has not established that he is entitled to mandamus relief. See Tex. R. App. P. 33.1; Walker v. Packer, 827 S.W.2d 833, 842 (Tex. 1992) (orig. proceeding) ("[M]andamus [will] issue only where there is no adequate remedy by appeal."); West v. Solito, 563 S.W.2d 240, 244-45 (Tex. 1978) (orig. proceeding); In re Credit Suisse First Boston Mortg. Capital, L.L.C., 257 S.W.3d 486, 493 (Tex. App.—Houston [14th Dist.] 2008, orig. proceeding) (applying Texas Rule of Appellate Procedure 33.1 to mandamus proceeding). Accordingly, we deny Hopkins's petition for writ of mandamus. See Tex. R. App. P. 52.8.

/s/_________

Cindy Olson Bourland, Justice Before Justices Puryear, Field, and Bourland Filed: December 12, 2017


Summaries of

In re Hopkins

TEXAS COURT OF APPEALS, THIRD DISTRICT, AT AUSTIN
Dec 12, 2017
NO. 03-17-00429-CV (Tex. App. Dec. 12, 2017)
Case details for

In re Hopkins

Case Details

Full title:In re Jermaine Hopkins

Court:TEXAS COURT OF APPEALS, THIRD DISTRICT, AT AUSTIN

Date published: Dec 12, 2017

Citations

NO. 03-17-00429-CV (Tex. App. Dec. 12, 2017)