From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

In re Hill

Court of Appeals of Texas, Fifth District, Dallas
Apr 23, 2010
No. 05-10-00463-CV (Tex. App. Apr. 23, 2010)

Opinion

No. 05-10-00463-CV

Opinion issued April 23, 2010.

Original Proceeding from the Probate Court No. 2 Dallas County, Texas, Trial Court Cause Nos. PR-07-02210-2A, PR-08-00830-2, and PR-09-03782-2.

Before Justices BRIDGES, RICHTER, and FILLMORE.


MEMORANDUM OPINION


Before the Court is relators' April 20, 2010 petition for writ of mandamus. The facts and issues are well known to the parties, so we need not recount them in detail herein. Relators claim that Regional Administrative Judge John Ovard was not authorized to appoint Judge Nikki DeShazo to hear relators' motion to recuse Judge Robert E. Price. On the record before us, we do not have jurisdiction over Judge Ovard's order appointing Judge DeShazo to hear the motion to recuse. See Tex. Gov't Code Ann. § 22.221 (Vernon 2004); In re Michael Hooper Associates, P.C., No. 05-09-01291-CV, 2009 WL 3647580 (Tex. App.-Dallas Nov. 5, 2009, orig. proceeding). Accordingly, we DISMISS relator's petition for writ of mandamus for want of jurisdiction.


Summaries of

In re Hill

Court of Appeals of Texas, Fifth District, Dallas
Apr 23, 2010
No. 05-10-00463-CV (Tex. App. Apr. 23, 2010)
Case details for

In re Hill

Case Details

Full title:IN RE ALBERT G. HILL, III AND ERIN HILL, Relators

Court:Court of Appeals of Texas, Fifth District, Dallas

Date published: Apr 23, 2010

Citations

No. 05-10-00463-CV (Tex. App. Apr. 23, 2010)

Citing Cases

In re Johnson

This Court does not have mandamus jurisdiction over Judge Ovard for actions he takes as presiding judge of…

IN RE ES ENERGY SOLUTIONS

As to Judge Ovard, we conclude on the record before us that we lack jurisdiction to review his denial of the…