Opinion
No. 20-2108
12-21-2020
In re: ANTONIO MARCO HERRERA, Petitioner.
Antonio Marco Herrera, Petitioner Pro Se.
UNPUBLISHED
On Petition for Extraordinary Writ. (1:19-cv-01301-LO-JFA) Before THACKER, HARRIS, and QUATTLEBAUM, Circuit Judges. Petition denied by unpublished per curiam opinion. Antonio Marco Herrera, Petitioner Pro Se. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. PER CURIAM:
Antonio Marco Herrera, a Virginia inmate, petitions this court for a writ of error coram nobis. In his petition, Herrera challenges this court's September 29, 2020 decision dismissing as interlocutory his appeal from the district court's order denying his motion to appoint counsel in his pending 28 U.S.C. § 2254 action. See Herrera v. Clarke, 823 F. App'x 210, 211 (4th Cir. 2020) (No. 20-6481).
We conclude that Herrera fails to establish that he is entitled to a writ of error coram nobis. See United States v. Akinsade, 686 F.3d 248, 252 (4th Cir. 2012) (identifying requirements for issuance of writ). Accordingly, we deny his petition. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
PETITION DENIED