From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

In re Hempstead v. Civil Serv. Emp. Assoc

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Aug 13, 2001
286 A.D.2d 401 (N.Y. App. Div. 2001)

Opinion

Argued June 18, 2001.

August 13, 2001.

In a proceeding pursuant to CPLR article 75 to permanently stay arbitration, the appeal is from an order of the Supreme Court, Nassau County (Winick, J.), dated October 2, 2000, which granted the petition and stayed the arbitration, and denied the cross motion to compel arbitration.

Louis D. Stober, Jr., LLC, Garden City, N.Y., for appellants.

Joseph J. Ra, Town Attorney, Hempstead, N.Y. (Susan P. Jacobs of counsel), for respondent.

Before: FRED T. SANTUCCI, J.P., GLORIA GOLDSTEIN, ANITA R. FLORIO, STEPHEN G. CRANE, JJ.


ORDERED that the order is affirmed, with costs.

Contrary to the appellants' contentions, the Supreme Court properly found that the grievances the appellants seek to arbitrate concern the reclassification of certain positions from part time/seasonal to full time. As the parties' collective bargaining agreement provides in Schedule D, Part 1.7, and as the appellants acknowledge in their brief, classification issues are not properly the subject of a grievance arbitration (cf., Town of Brookhaven v. Civil Serv. Emply. Assn., 141 A.D.2d 630).

The appellants' contention that they are merely seeking retroactive wages and benefits for two of the petitioner's employees is improperly raised for the first time on appeal (see, Licari v. Board of Ed. of Cold Spring Harbor Centl. School Dist., 280 A.D.2d 673; cf., Block v. Magee, 146 A.D.2d 730). In any event, the appellants failed to show that the parties agreed to arbitrate that issue (cf., Town of Brookhaven v. Civil Serv. Emply. Assn., supra; see generally, Matter of Board of Educ. of Watertown City School Dist. [Watertown Educ. Assn.], 93 N.Y.2d 132).

In light of our determination, we need not reach the appellants' remaining contentions.

SANTUCCI, J.P., GOLDSTEIN, FLORIO and CRANE, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

In re Hempstead v. Civil Serv. Emp. Assoc

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Aug 13, 2001
286 A.D.2d 401 (N.Y. App. Div. 2001)
Case details for

In re Hempstead v. Civil Serv. Emp. Assoc

Case Details

Full title:IN THE MATTER OF TOWN OF HEMPSTEAD, respondent, v. CIVIL SERVICE EMPLOYEES…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department

Date published: Aug 13, 2001

Citations

286 A.D.2d 401 (N.Y. App. Div. 2001)
728 N.Y.S.2d 715

Citing Cases

Town of N. Hempstead v. Civil Serv. Emps. Ass'n, Inc., Local 1000

ambit of section X, because it actively participated in the grievance procedure through Step 2, and presented…

Cnty. of Nassau v. Civil Serv. Emps. Ass'n

Here, the respondents are essentially seeking a reclassification of Grzymalski's position from seasonal to…