In re Hedloy

Full title: IN RE: ATLE HEDLOY, Appellant

Court: United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit

Date published: Jun 15, 2016

652 F. App'x 973 (Fed. Cir. 2016)

Opinion

2016-1093

06-15-2016

IN RE: ATLE HEDLOY, Appellant

BRUCE D. SUNSTEIN, Sunstein Kann Murphy & Timbers LLP, Boston, MA, argued for appellant. MONICA BARNES LATEEF, Office of the Solicitor, United States Patent and Trademark Office, Alexandria, VA, argued for appellee Michelle K. Lee. Also represented by THOMAS W. KRAUSE, MEREDITH HOPE SCHOENFELD, SCOTT C. WEIDENFELLER.

PER CURIAM

NOTE: This disposition is nonprecedential. Appeal from the United States Patent and Trademark Office, Patent Trial and Appeal Board in No. 13/449,086.

JUDGMENT

BRUCE D. SUNSTEIN, Sunstein Kann Murphy & Timbers LLP, Boston, MA, argued for appellant. MONICA BARNES LATEEF, Office of the Solicitor, United States Patent and Trademark Office, Alexandria, VA, argued for appellee Michelle K. Lee. Also represented by THOMAS W. KRAUSE, MEREDITH HOPE SCHOENFELD, SCOTT C. WEIDENFELLER. THIS CAUSE having been heard and considered, it is ORDERED and ADJUDGED:

PER CURIAM (PROST, Chief Judge, BRYSON and STOLL, Circuit Judges).

AFFIRMED. See Fed. Cir. R. 36.

ENTERED BY ORDER OF THE COURT June 15, 2016

Date

/s/ Peter R. Marksteiner

Peter R. Marksteiner

Clerk of Court