From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

In re Hawkins

COURT OF APPEALS SECOND DISTRICT OF TEXAS FORT WORTH
Apr 24, 2013
NO. 02-13-00120-CV (Tex. App. Apr. 24, 2013)

Opinion

NO. 02-13-00120-CV

04-24-2013

IN RE LLEWELLYN HAWKINS RELATOR


ORIGINAL PROCEEDING


MEMORANDUM OPINION

We have considered relator's petition for writ of mandamus asking this court to grant mandamus relief in matters related to his application for an article 11.07 post-conviction writ of habeas corpus. See Tex. Code Crim. Proc. Ann. art. 11.07 § 5 (West Supp. 2012). But because the Texas Court of Criminal Appeals has exclusive jurisdiction over applications for habeas corpus relief under article 11.07, relator's petition does not raise an issue regarding the need to protect, or a threat to, our jurisdiction; thus, this court lacks jurisdiction to grant mandamus relief. See id.; see also McCree v. Hampton, 824 S.W.2d 578, 579 (Tex. Crim. App. 1992) (reasoning that the Texas Court of Criminal Appeals has jurisdiction to order the trial court to rule on applicant's post-conviction writ of habeas corpus.); In re McAfee, 53 S.W.3d 715, 717 (Tex. App.—Houston [1st Dist.] 2001, orig. proceeding) (concluding that intermediate courts of appeals have no authority to issue writs of mandamus in criminal matters pertaining to article 11.07 writs). Accordingly, relator's petition for writ of mandamus is denied.

PER CURIAM PANEL: MEIER, J., LIVINGSTON, C.J.; and GABRIEL, J.

See Tex. R. App. P. 47.4, 52.8(d).


Summaries of

In re Hawkins

COURT OF APPEALS SECOND DISTRICT OF TEXAS FORT WORTH
Apr 24, 2013
NO. 02-13-00120-CV (Tex. App. Apr. 24, 2013)
Case details for

In re Hawkins

Case Details

Full title:IN RE LLEWELLYN HAWKINS RELATOR

Court:COURT OF APPEALS SECOND DISTRICT OF TEXAS FORT WORTH

Date published: Apr 24, 2013

Citations

NO. 02-13-00120-CV (Tex. App. Apr. 24, 2013)