From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

In re Haverstraw Park v. Runcible Prop

Court of Appeals of the State of New York
Jul 3, 1973
33 N.Y.2d 637 (N.Y. 1973)

Opinion

Submitted May 21, 1973

Decided July 3, 1973

Appeal from the Appellate Division of the Supreme Court in the Second Judicial Department, MORTON B. SILBERMAN, J.

Bernard E. Stanger for motion.

Donald Tirschwell opposed.


Motion dismissed upon the ground it was not made within the time prescribed by statute (CPLR 5513). A stipulation of the parties cannot confer jurisdiction on the Court of Appeals to consider an untimely motion.


Summaries of

In re Haverstraw Park v. Runcible Prop

Court of Appeals of the State of New York
Jul 3, 1973
33 N.Y.2d 637 (N.Y. 1973)
Case details for

In re Haverstraw Park v. Runcible Prop

Case Details

Full title:In the Matter of HAVERSTRAW PARK, INC., Respondent, v. RUNCIBLE PROPERTIES…

Court:Court of Appeals of the State of New York

Date published: Jul 3, 1973

Citations

33 N.Y.2d 637 (N.Y. 1973)
347 N.Y.S.2d 585
301 N.E.2d 553

Citing Cases

Xander Corp. v. Haberman

"An appeal as of right must be taken within thirty days after service by a party upon the appellant of a…

Wan Fund Leung v. Yan Q. Sun

Rather, the action is automatically stayed upon the party's death (see Perez v City of New York, 95 A.D.3d at…