From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

In re Hall

Court of Errors and Appeals
Oct 20, 1924
126 A. 924 (N.J. 1924)

Opinion

Argued May 20, 1924 —

Decided October 20, 1924.

On appeal from the Supreme Court, whose opinion is reported in 99 N.J.L. 1.

For the appellants, Edward L. Katzenbach.

For the respondents, McCarter English.


The judgment under review herein should be affirmed, for the reasons expressed in the opinion delivered by Chief Justice Gummere in the Supreme Court.

For affirmance — TRENCHARD, MINTURN, KALISCH, BLACK, CAMPBELL, WHITE, GARDNER, VAN BUSKIRK, CLARK, KAYS, JJ. 10.

For modification — PARKER, KATZENBACH, LLOYD, JJ. 3.


Summaries of

In re Hall

Court of Errors and Appeals
Oct 20, 1924
126 A. 924 (N.J. 1924)
Case details for

In re Hall

Case Details

Full title:IN THE MATTER OF THE INHERITANCE TAXES ON THE ESTATE OF FRANCIS A. HALL…

Court:Court of Errors and Appeals

Date published: Oct 20, 1924

Citations

126 A. 924 (N.J. 1924)
126 A. 924

Citing Cases

Corry v. Passaic Nat. Bank and Trust Co.

"Good will, of course, is an asset. In re Bottomley, 92 N.J. Eq. 202; 111 A. 605; In re Hall, 99 N.J.L. 1;…

Blut v. Katz

Our own cases dealing with the transfer inheritance tax have made use of the formula accepted here. Stated…