From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

In re Hakeem Jeffries

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Third Department
Jun 16, 2011
85 A.D.3d 1431 (N.Y. App. Div. 2011)

Opinion

No. 511395.

June 16, 2011.

Appeal from a judgment of the Supreme Court (Connolly, J.), entered January 6, 2011 in Albany County, which dismissed petitioners' application, in a proceeding pursuant to CPLR article 78, to review a determination of respondent Commissioner of Education finding Cathleen Black qualified to receive a school district leader certificate.

Arthur Z. Schwartz, Advocates for Justice, New York City, for Hakeem Jeffries and others, appellants.

Eric T. Schneiderman, Attorney General, Albany (Julie Sheridan of counsel), for David M. Steiner and others, respondents.

Michael A. Cardozo, Corporation Counsel, New York City (Drake A. Colley of counsel), for City of New York, respondent.

Before: Rose, J.P., McCarthy, Garry and Egan Jr., JJ.


In December 2010, petitioners commenced this proceeding seeking to annul a determination of respondent Commissioner of Education that Cathleen Black was an "exceptionally qualified person[]" (Education Law § 3003; see 8 NYCRR 80-3.10 [b] [3]) eligible to receive a superintendent's certificate — also known as a school district leader certificate — which she needed to serve as Chancellor of the New York City Public Schools ( see Education Law § 3003). Supreme Court dismissed the petition and petitioners appeal.

Given that Cathleen Black resigned from her position as Chancellor in April 2011, this proceeding no longer involves a determination of "the rights of persons which are actually controverted in a particular case pending before [any] tribunal" ( Matter of Hearst Corp. v Clyne, 50 NY2d 707, 713). Therefore, this proceeding must be dismissed as moot. Because we are not persuaded that the issue presented in this appeal has a sufficient likelihood of repetition and is a phenomenon typically evading review ( see id. at 714-715), we do not agree with petitioners that the exception to the mootness doctrine applies.

This Court may take judicial notice of matters of public record ( see e.g. Matter of Siwek v Mahoney, 39 NY2d 159, 163 n 2 [1976]).

Ordered that the appeal is dismissed, as moot, without costs.


Summaries of

In re Hakeem Jeffries

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Third Department
Jun 16, 2011
85 A.D.3d 1431 (N.Y. App. Div. 2011)
Case details for

In re Hakeem Jeffries

Case Details

Full title:In the Matter of HAKEEM JEFFRIES, as Parent and Guardian of JEREMIAH…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Third Department

Date published: Jun 16, 2011

Citations

85 A.D.3d 1431 (N.Y. App. Div. 2011)
2011 N.Y. Slip Op. 5166
924 N.Y.S.2d 862

Citing Cases

People v. Alnutt

In conjunction therewith, defendant moved for this Court to take judicial notice of various documents,…

Salinas v. Power Servs. Sols.

Matter of Barth v Cassar, 45 A.D.2d 161, 163 [1974], lv denied 35 N.Y.2d 642 [1974]). The development brought…