From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

In re Grand Jury Proceedings

United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit
Mar 26, 1979
593 F.2d 906 (9th Cir. 1979)

Summary

recalling mandate and vacating decision that had become moot before the opinion was filed

Summary of this case from IAL Aircraft Holding, Inc. v. Federal Aviation Administration

Opinion

No. 78-3222.

March 26, 1979.

Thomas C. Troy, Dorchester, Mass., on brief, for appellants.

Kenneth C. Bauman, Portland, Or., on brief, for appellee.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Oregon; Otto R. Skopil, Judge.

Before WRIGHT, GOODWIN, and ANDERSON, Circuit Judges.


ORDER


After this appeal had been submitted for decision, but before the opinion had been filed, the defendants purged themselves of contempt and mooted the appeal. After our decision was filed, the defendants advised this court, by a motion to recall the mandate, that the appeal was moot, and requested that it be dismissed.

Any judgment heretofore entered is, accordingly, vacated.


Summaries of

In re Grand Jury Proceedings

United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit
Mar 26, 1979
593 F.2d 906 (9th Cir. 1979)

recalling mandate and vacating decision that had become moot before the opinion was filed

Summary of this case from IAL Aircraft Holding, Inc. v. Federal Aviation Administration
Case details for

In re Grand Jury Proceedings

Case Details

Full title:IN RE GRAND JURY PROCEEDINGS. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, APPELLEE, v. ALLAN…

Court:United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit

Date published: Mar 26, 1979

Citations

593 F.2d 906 (9th Cir. 1979)

Citing Cases

IAL Aircraft Holding, Inc. v. Federal Aviation Administration

More recently, the Ninth Circuit withdrew an opinion that it unknowingly had filed a few months after the…

Evans v. Bank of N.Y. Trust Co., N.A. (In re Evans)

See id. at 354 ("[A]s the case was decided at the present term, . . . we have decided to vacate our judgment,…