From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

In re Gordon

Supreme Court of Michigan.
Nov 23, 2011
490 Mich. 917 (Mich. 2011)

Opinion

Docket No. 143673.COA No. 301592.

2011-11-23

In re J.L. GORDON, Minor.


Order

On order of the Court, the application for leave to appeal the August 11, 2011 judgment of the Court of Appeals is considered. We direct the Clerk to schedule oral argument on whether to grant the application or take other action. MCR 7.302(H)(1). At oral argument, the parties shall address: (1) whether the notice requirements of § 1912(a) of the Indian Child Welfare Act (ICWA), 25 USC 1901 et seq., are invoked, such that the family court knows or has reason to know that an Indian child is involved in an involuntary child protective proceeding, when, as occurred here, the respondent mother stated at the preliminary hearing that her parents were tribal members but she was not; (2) if so, whether the Department of Human Services (DHS) and the family court are under a duty to make a complete record of their compliance with the notice requirements of the ICWA; and (3) whether a parent can waive a minor child's status as an “Indian Child” under the ICWA, 25 USC 1903(4), or waive compliance with the federal law's requirements, and, if so, whether the respondent mother's statement on the record that her family had been notified directly by the tribe that they were not entitled to money or benefits constituted a waiver. The parties may file supplemental briefs within 28 days of the date of this order, but they should not submit mere restatements of their application papers.


Summaries of

In re Gordon

Supreme Court of Michigan.
Nov 23, 2011
490 Mich. 917 (Mich. 2011)
Case details for

In re Gordon

Case Details

Full title:In re J.L. GORDON, Minor.

Court:Supreme Court of Michigan.

Date published: Nov 23, 2011

Citations

490 Mich. 917 (Mich. 2011)
805 N.W.2d 444

Citing Cases

In re Nesbitt

Indeed, in In re Morris, our Supreme Court noted the following under circumstances similar to the instant…

In re Morris

Id. Hinkle applied for leave to appeal in this Court, and pursuant to MCR 7.302(H)(1), we directed the clerk…