From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

In re Generali COVID-19 Travel Ins. Litig.

United States District Court, S.D. New York
Feb 9, 2022
20-md-2968 (S.D.N.Y. Feb. 9, 2022)

Opinion

20-md-2968

02-09-2022

IN RE GENERALI COVID-19 TRAVEL INSURANCE LITIGATION


(PROPOSED) FINAL JUDGMENT AS TO PLAINTIFFS CLONTS'S, GARNER'S, JOHNER'S, SHARMA'S, MORRIS'S, AND SCHRADER'S CLAIMS AND CERTAIN OF PLAINTIFF OGLEVEE'S CLAIMS

Following transfer to this Court as ordered by the United States Judicial Panel on Multidistrict Litigation, plaintiffs filed a consolidated class action complaint against Defendants Generali U.S. Branch and Customized Services Administrators, Inc. alleging breach of insurance contracts and related non-contract claims. See ECF #24. This Court granted Defendants' motion to dismiss the claims of Plaintiffs Clonts, Garner, Johner, Sharma, Morris, and Schrader for failure to state a claim under Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 12(b)(6). See ECF #56. The Court also granted Defendants' motion to dismiss plaintiff Oglevee's claims arising out of the insurance policy she purchased in connection with her flight tickets, while staying as subject to arbitration her other claims arising out of a different insurance policy purchased through VRBO.com. See id.', ECF #57. As all of plaintiffs' claims that the Court has not dismissed are stayed pending conclusion of arbitration, the Court now enters this Final Judgment.

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED, ADJUDGED, AND DECREED that the cases and claims of Plaintiffs Clonts, Gamer, Johner, Sharma, Morris, and Schrader are severed and dismissed with prejudice for the reasons stated in the Court's December 21, 2021 Order. ECF #56.

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED, ADJUDGED, AND DECREED that the claims of Plaintiff Oglevee arising out of the Generali travel insurance policy she purchased in connection with her flight tickets are severed and dismissed with prejudice. See Consolidated Complaint ¶ 98, ECF 1 #24; see also ECF #56 at 9. This Final Judgment does not apply to Plaintiff Oglevee's other claims (i.e., those arising out of the policy she purchased through VRB0.com), which remain stayed pending the conclusion of arbitration. See ECF #57 at 23.

Finding no just reason for delay, the Court enters this judgment under Rule 54(b) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. The Clerk is respectfully directed to enter this Final Judgment against plaintiffs Clonts, Garner, Johner, Sharma, Morris, Schrader, and Oglevee and in favor of Defendants Generali U.S. Branch and Customized Services Administrators, Inc. forthwith. 2

As the motion to dismiss was granted with respect to plaintiffs' superseding consolidated class action complaint in this multidistrict litigation, the Court enters this final, appealable judgment pursuant to Rule 54(b) with respect to all plaintiffs and claims specified herein. See e.g., Gelboim v. Bank of America Corp., 574 U.S. 405, 413 n.3 (2015); Bell v. Publix Super Markets, Inc., 982 F.3d 468, 489-90 (7th Cir. 2020) (discussing effect of consolidated complaints in multidistrict litigation on finality of judgments and Rule 54(b)).


Summaries of

In re Generali COVID-19 Travel Ins. Litig.

United States District Court, S.D. New York
Feb 9, 2022
20-md-2968 (S.D.N.Y. Feb. 9, 2022)
Case details for

In re Generali COVID-19 Travel Ins. Litig.

Case Details

Full title:IN RE GENERALI COVID-19 TRAVEL INSURANCE LITIGATION

Court:United States District Court, S.D. New York

Date published: Feb 9, 2022

Citations

20-md-2968 (S.D.N.Y. Feb. 9, 2022)