Opinion
Nos. 150316348; A127997 Lane County Circuit Court.
Filed April 4, 2007.
May 30, 2007.
Bryan T. Hodges, Judge.
Jeffrey E. Potter and Gardner, Honsowetz, Potter, Budge Ford for petition.
Vanessa L. Carter for response.
Before Edmonds, Presiding Judge, and Brewer, Chief Judge, and Wollheim, Judge.
PER CURIAM
Reconsideration allowed; former opinion modified to correct mathematical error; adhered to as modified.
Wife, who prevailed as appellant, see Gano-Ridge and Ridge, 211 Or App 393, 155 P3d 84 (2007), petitions for reconsideration, pointing out a mathematical error in our opinion. Wife notes that, at 211 Or App at 411 n 9, we stated the total assets awarded to wife as $334,495, which included the trial court's previous equalizing judgment of $90,495. We then included the amount of the former equalizing judgment again in the equalizing judgment of $311,520, thereby overstating by $90,495 the net property award to wife ($646,015), 211 Or App at 411, when the correct calculation of the property awarded to wife is $555,520. Wife asks the court to increase the equalizing judgment to $402,015 so that the net award to wife is $646,015. As we explained in our opinion, a just and proper award to wife requires an equalizing judgment to wife of $311,520. We accordingly correct the calculation at 211 Or App at 411 n 9 as follows:
$244,000 total assets awarded to wife $311,520 equalizing judgment _______ $555,520 We similarly correct the amount stated as the net property award to wife at 211 Or App at 411 as $555,520.Reconsideration allowed; former opinion modified to correct mathematical error; adhered to as modified.