From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

In re Forfeiture of One 1979 Ford

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District
Jun 26, 1984
450 So. 2d 863 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1984)

Summary

In One 1979 Ford the appellant had used the vehicle only to travel to and from a bar where he consummated an illegal drug transaction.

Summary of this case from Duckham v. State

Opinion

No. 83-1372.

April 18, 1984. Rehearing Denied June 26, 1984.

Appeal from the Circuit Court, Broward County, James M. Reasbeck, J.

Howard I. Alabaster of Brimmell Graham, P.A., Fort Lauderdale, for appellant John Kovach.

Bruce W. Jolly of Shailer, Purdy Jolly, Fort Lauderdale, for appellee George A. Brescher, Sheriff of Broward County.


This is an appeal in a forfeiture case where the only connection shown between the vehicle forfeited and the appellant's illegal activities was that the vehicle was used by the appellant to travel to and from a bar where appellant consummated an illegal drug transaction. We agree with the trial court that these facts constitute a sufficient showing of the use of the vehicle to facilitate or aid and abet in the commission of the illegal transaction to authorize forfeiture. See Chapter 932, Florida Statutes (1983) and In re Forfeiture of 1979 Toyota Corolla, 424 So.2d 922 (Fla. 4th DCA 1982).

AFFIRMED.

ANSTEAD, C.J., and LETTS and GLICKSTEIN, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

In re Forfeiture of One 1979 Ford

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District
Jun 26, 1984
450 So. 2d 863 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1984)

In One 1979 Ford the appellant had used the vehicle only to travel to and from a bar where he consummated an illegal drug transaction.

Summary of this case from Duckham v. State
Case details for

In re Forfeiture of One 1979 Ford

Case Details

Full title:IN RE FORFEITURE OF ONE 1979 FORD V.I.N. 9G87F167035

Court:District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District

Date published: Jun 26, 1984

Citations

450 So. 2d 863 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1984)

Citing Cases

State v. One 1977 Volkswagen

Contrary to the holding of the trial court, we find that Duckham used his vehicle to facilitate the sale of…

Smith v. Caggiano

Accordingly, the Cadillac was contraband. See Duckham v. State, 478 So.2d 347 (Fla. 1985); One 1976 Dodge Van…