Opinion
No. 107182.
Reconsideration Granted in Part September 23, 1997.
The Supreme Court's order of May 30, 1997, 454 Mich. 916, is vacated and the following order is entered:
In lieu of granting leave to appeal, the judgment of the Court of Appeals is modified. MCR 7.302(F)(1). Proponents of an allegedly lost, destroyed, or suppressed holographic will do not need to show that the holographic will had two subscribing witnesses. MCL 700.123; MSA 27.5123. In all other respects leave to appeal is denied. Reported below: 218 Mich. App. 211.