From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

In re Fisher

Supreme Court of California
Jul 14, 1982
31 Cal.3d 919 (Cal. 1982)

Opinion

Docket No. L.A. 31504.

July 14, 1982.


MEMORANDUM CASE

OPINION

THE COURT.

Mosk, J., did not participate.

The Commission on Judicial Performance has recommended that we censure Hugo Fisher, a Judge of the Superior Court of San Diego County, for "conduct prejudicial to the administration of justice that brings the judicial office into disrepute." He has not requested review of the recommendation; and under California Rules of Court, rule 919, that failure "may be deemed a consent to a determination on the merits based upon the record filed by the Commission."

Substantial evidence supports the conclusion that Judge Fisher violated canon 3 of the California Code of Judicial Conduct, which states that "[a] judge should . . ., except as authorized by law, neither initiate nor consider ex parte or other communications concerning a pending or impending proceeding." (Canon 3, part A(4).) Accordingly, by this order he is publicly censured.


Summaries of

In re Fisher

Supreme Court of California
Jul 14, 1982
31 Cal.3d 919 (Cal. 1982)
Case details for

In re Fisher

Case Details

Full title:In re HUGO FISHER, a Judge of the Superior Court, on Censure

Court:Supreme Court of California

Date published: Jul 14, 1982

Citations

31 Cal.3d 919 (Cal. 1982)
184 Cal. Rptr. 296
647 P.2d 1075

Citing Cases

People v. Williams

It seems clear to us that the trial judge, although evidently not acting in bad faith, engaged in misconduct:…

People v. Ball

Violation of canon 3B(7) constitutes misconduct, even when the judge is acting in good faith. (People v.…