From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

In re Estate of Taylor

Supreme Court of Minnesota
Dec 14, 1928
222 N.W. 528 (Minn. 1928)

Opinion

No. 27,284.

December 14, 1928.

Inheritance tax.

Minnesota municipal bonds and Minnesota certificates of indebtedness owned by a nonresident are subject to the state inheritance tax. [Reporter]

The executors of the estate of Henry R. Taylor appealed from a final order or judgment of the district court for Ramsey county, Bechhoefer, J. adjudging that the state of Minnesota is entitled to collect an inheritance tax from said estate. Affirmed.

G. A. Youngquist, Attorney General, and John F. Bonner, Assistant Attorney General, for the state.

Cadwalader, Wickersham Taft and Davis, Severance Morgan, for respondents.



Appeal from a final order which is the equivalent of a judgment entered on November 14, 1928, adjudging in substance that the state is entitled to collect an inheritance tax in said estate in relation to municipal bonds issued by the cities of St. Paul and Minneapolis, Minnesota, and also in relation to certificates of indebtedness of the state of Minnesota.

The questions presented are those decided by this court on a former appeal as reported in 175 Minn. 310, 219 N.W. 153, 221 N.W. 64. Our previous conclusion was based upon the constitution of the United States and our conception of its construction by the United States Supreme Court. We did not there base our decision upon our own fundamental law but upon the federal authority, and upon authority of our previous conclusion and the federal constitution the said final order or judgment from which this appeal is taken is affirmed.


Summaries of

In re Estate of Taylor

Supreme Court of Minnesota
Dec 14, 1928
222 N.W. 528 (Minn. 1928)
Case details for

In re Estate of Taylor

Case Details

Full title:IN RE ESTATE OF HENRY R. TAYLOR

Court:Supreme Court of Minnesota

Date published: Dec 14, 1928

Citations

222 N.W. 528 (Minn. 1928)
222 N.W. 528

Citing Cases

Farmers Loan Co. v. Minnesota

P. 212. 6. This case does not present the question whether choses in action that have acquired a situs for…