From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Vialardi v. Vialardi

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Nov 17, 2009
67 A.D.3d 921 (N.Y. App. Div. 2009)

Opinion

No. 2009-03420.

November 17, 2009.

In related child custody proceedings pursuant to Family Court Act article 6, the father appeals, as limited by his brief, from so much of an order of the Family Court, Westchester County (Klein, J.), dated November 25, 2008, as, after a hearing, awarded the mother final decision-making authority for the subject child.

Berman Bavero Frucco Gouz, P.C., White Plains, N.Y. (Ronald J. Bavero and Howard Leitner of counsel), for respondent.

George E. Reed, Jr., White Plains, N.Y., attorney for the child.

Before: Dillon, J.P., Miller, Angiolillo and Dickerson, JJ., concur.


Ordered that the order is modified, on the law, on the facts, and in the exercise of discretion, by adding a provision thereto providing that the mother must consult with the father prior to exercising her final decision-making authority for the subject child; as so modified, the order is affirmed insofar as appealed from, without costs or disbursements.

While a custody award is a matter within the discretion of the trial court, whose determination is entitled to great weight on appeal ( see Eschbach v Eschbach, 56 NY2d 167, 173; Matter of Waldron v Dussek, 48 AD3d 471), here, the court should have directed that the mother consult with the father with respect to any issues involving the child's health, medical care, education, religion, and general welfare prior to exercising her final decision-making authority for the subject child.


Summaries of

Vialardi v. Vialardi

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Nov 17, 2009
67 A.D.3d 921 (N.Y. App. Div. 2009)
Case details for

Vialardi v. Vialardi

Case Details

Full title:In the Matter of ERIN VIALARDI, Respondent, v. ROBERT VIALARDI, Appellant…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department

Date published: Nov 17, 2009

Citations

67 A.D.3d 921 (N.Y. App. Div. 2009)
2009 N.Y. Slip Op. 8629
888 N.Y.S.2d 419

Citing Cases

Zall v. Theiss

However, it is inappropriate where, as here, the parties are antagonistic toward each other and have…

Prohaszka v. Prohaszka

Similarly, the record supports the determination that primary physical custody should be with the mother and…