From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

In re Ellis

Supreme Court of New Jersey
Sep 27, 2000
758 A.2d 1134 (N.J. 2000)

Opinion

September 27, 2000


ORDER

This matter having been presented to the Court pursuant to Rule 1:20-10(b) following a motion for discipline by consent of DANIEL ELLIS of WARREN, who was admitted to the bar of this State in 1974;

And the Office of Attorney Ethics and respondent having signed a stipulation of discipline by consent in which it was agreed that respondent violated Rule 1:20-1, Rule 1:28-2 and RPC 5.5 (practicing law while ineligible);

And the parties having agreed that respondent's conduct warrants a reprimand;

And the Disciplinary Review Board having determined that a reprimand is the appropriate discipline for respondent's ethics infractions and having granted the motion for discipline by consent;

And the Disciplinary Review Board having submitted the record of the proceedings to the Clerk of the Supreme Court for the entry of an order of discipline in accordance with Rule 1:20-16(e);

And good cause appearing;

It is ORDERED that DANIELS ELLIS is hereby reprimanded; and it is further

ORDERED that the entire record of this matter be made a permanent part of respondent's file as an attorney at law of this State; and it is further

ORDERED that respondent reimburse the Disciplinary Oversight Committee for appropriate administrative costs incurred in the prosecution of this matter.


Summaries of

In re Ellis

Supreme Court of New Jersey
Sep 27, 2000
758 A.2d 1134 (N.J. 2000)
Case details for

In re Ellis

Case Details

Full title:IN THE MATTER OF DANIEL ELLIS, AN ATTORNEY AT LAW

Court:Supreme Court of New Jersey

Date published: Sep 27, 2000

Citations

758 A.2d 1134 (N.J. 2000)
758 A.2d 1134

Citing Cases

In re Weil

k to the CPF was returned for insufficient funds; the attorney's excuses that she had not received the CPF's…

In re Heyburn

rned for insufficient funds; the attorney's excuses that she had not received the CPF's letters about her…