Summary
dismissing appeal of order granting motion to strike plea in intervention for want of jurisdiction
Summary of this case from Nghiem v. SajibOpinion
NO. 02-14-00158-CV
07-17-2014
IN THE INTEREST OF E.C., A CHILD
FROM THE 393RD DISTRICT COURT OF DENTON COUNTY
TRIAL COURT NO. 125-393-2013
MEMORANDUM OPINION
On May 13, 2014, the trial court signed an order granting Appellees' motion to strike the plea in intervention filed by L.G. L.G. filed a notice of appeal on May 20, 2014, challenging the order. On May 21, 2014, we notified the parties that it appeared the order striking L.G.'s plea in intervention was not a final judgment or an appealable interlocutory order. See Metromedia LongDistance, Inc. v. Hughes, 810 S.W.2d 494, 499 (Tex. App.—San Antonio 1991, writ denied) (recognizing order dismissing or striking petition in intervention may not be appealed by intervenor before entry of final judgment). We instructed L.G., or any party desiring to continue the appeal, to respond no later than June 2, 2014, showing grounds for continuing the appeal, and we warned that the appeal was subject to dismissal for want of jurisdiction. See Tex. R. App. P. 42.3, 44.3. No party responded. Accordingly, we dismiss this appeal for want of jurisdiction. See Tex. R. App. P. 42.3(a), 43.2(f).
PER CURIAM PANEL: GABRIEL, J.; LIVINGSTON, C.J.; and DAUPHINOT, J.
See Tex. R. App. P. 47.4.