From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

In re DVI, Inc. Sec. Litig.

United States District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania
May 31, 2005
Civil Action No. 03-5336 (E.D. Pa. May. 31, 2005)

Summary

ruling on the Third Amended Complaint, Doc. No. 88

Summary of this case from In re DVI, Inc. Securities Litigation

Opinion

Civil Action No. 03-5336.

May 31, 2005


ORDER


AND NOW, this 31st day of May, 2005, upon consideration of the United States' Motion to Stay Proceedings (Doc. No. 180), filed May 17, 2005, it is hereby ORDERED that the Motion is GRANTED.

It is further ORDERED that:

1. This matter shall be stayed for all purposes for 120 days pending completion of the ongoing investigation by the United States Attorney's Office and the Federal Bureau of Investigation;
2. The United States shall advise the parties and the Court at the expiration of this stay, in writing, as to the status of the investigation;
3. The Clerk of Court shall mark this action closed for statistical purposes and place the matter in the Civil Suspense File pending further notification; and
4. The Court shall retain jurisdiction; and the case shall be restored to the trial docket when the action is in a status so that it may proceed to final disposition; this order shall not prejudice the rights of the parties to this litigation.


Summaries of

In re DVI, Inc. Sec. Litig.

United States District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania
May 31, 2005
Civil Action No. 03-5336 (E.D. Pa. May. 31, 2005)

ruling on the Third Amended Complaint, Doc. No. 88

Summary of this case from In re DVI, Inc. Securities Litigation

ruling on the Third Amended Complaint, Doc. No. 88

Summary of this case from In re DVI, Inc. Sec. Litig.

declining to extend continuing violation doctrine to case brought under securities laws

Summary of this case from U.S. Sec. & Exch. Comm'n v. Brown
Case details for

In re DVI, Inc. Sec. Litig.

Case Details

Full title:IN RE: DVI, INC. SECURITIES LITIGATION

Court:United States District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania

Date published: May 31, 2005

Citations

Civil Action No. 03-5336 (E.D. Pa. May. 31, 2005)

Citing Cases

In re Royal Dutch/Shell Transport Securities Litigation

Under Rule 10b-5(b), "plaintiffs must first establish that the defendants made a materially false or…

U.S. Securities Exchange Commission v. Brown

District courts in the Second and Third Circuits have indicated great skepticism that it does. In re Comverse…