From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

In re Disciplinary Action Against Lillie

Supreme Court of Minnesota
Dec 29, 2005
707 N.W.2d 367 (Minn. 2005)

Opinion

No. A05-2436.

December 29, 2005.


ORDER

The Director of the Office of Lawyers Professional Responsibility has filed a petition for disciplinary action alleging that respondent John Canfield Lillie, III, committed professional misconduct warranting public discipline, namely, misuse of legal correspondence in order to evade Department of Corrections rules, in violation of Minn. R. Prof. Conduct 8.4(c) and (d).

Respondent admits his conduct violated the Rules of Professional Conduct, waives his rights under Rule 14, Rules on Lawyers Professional Responsibility (RLPR), and has entered into a stipulation with the Director in which they jointly recommend that the appropriate discipline is public reprimand and payment of $900 in costs and disbursements pursuant to Rule 24, RLPR.

This court has independently reviewed the file and approves the jointly recommended disposition.

Based upon all the files, records and proceedings herein,

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that respondent John Canfield Lillie, III, is publicly reprimanded and that he shall pay $900 in costs pursuant to Rule 24, RLPR.

BY THE COURT:

/s/ Russell A. Anderson Associate Justice


Summaries of

In re Disciplinary Action Against Lillie

Supreme Court of Minnesota
Dec 29, 2005
707 N.W.2d 367 (Minn. 2005)
Case details for

In re Disciplinary Action Against Lillie

Case Details

Full title:In re Petition for DISCIPLINARY ACTION AGAINST John Canfield LILLIE, III…

Court:Supreme Court of Minnesota

Date published: Dec 29, 2005

Citations

707 N.W.2d 367 (Minn. 2005)

Citing Cases

In re Trombley

We publicly reprimanded attorneys for Rule 8.4(c) violations when an attorney evaded prison rules concerning…