From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

In Re: Derrick Millard

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
Dec 15, 2010
404 F. App'x 804 (4th Cir. 2010)

Opinion

No. 09-2266.

Submitted: November 18, 2010.

Decided: December 15, 2010.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Maryland, at Baltimore. Marvin J. Garbis, Senior District Judge. (8:08-cv-03002-MJG; 08-17964).

Matthew A. Egeli, John Russell Griffin, Hartman Egeli, LLP, Annapolis, Maryland, for Appellant. Derrick Millard, Sr., Tracie M. Millard, Appellees Pro Se. Tara A. Twomey, Carmel, California, for Amicus Supporting Appellees.

Before KING, DUNCAN, and WYNN, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.


SunTrust appeals the district court's order affirming the bankruptcy court's order granting the Debtors' Motion to Avoid Lien. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. SunTrust Bank v. Millard, No. 8:08-cv-03002-MJG, 08-17964 (D. Md. Nov. 7, 2008) 414 B.R. 73 (Sept. 28, 2009). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.


Summaries of

In Re: Derrick Millard

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
Dec 15, 2010
404 F. App'x 804 (4th Cir. 2010)
Case details for

In Re: Derrick Millard

Case Details

Full title:In re: DERRICK MILLARD, SR.; TRACIE M. MILLARD, Debtors. SUNTRUST BANK…

Court:UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

Date published: Dec 15, 2010

Citations

404 F. App'x 804 (4th Cir. 2010)

Citing Cases

Cruickshanks v. Permberton Oaks Townhouse Ass'n, Inc. (In re Cruickshanks)

For purposes of this Memorandum Opinion, the Court will use the Property value to which the parties…

Cruickshanks v. Permberton Oaks Townhouse Ass'n, Inc. (In re Cruickshanks)

For purposes of this Memorandum Opinion, the Court will use the Property value to which the parties…