From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

In re Davids

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department
Apr 22, 2010
72 A.D.3d 557 (N.Y. App. Div. 2010)

Opinion

No. 2588.

April 22, 2010.

Order and judgment (one paper), Supreme Court, New York County (Joan A. Madden, J.), entered March 26, 2009, which denied the petition seeking, inter alia, to annul respondents' determination demoting petitioner from the rank of probationary captain to his permanent title of lieutenant, and dismissed the proceeding brought pursuant to CPLR article 78, unanimously affirmed, without costs.

Seelig Ungaro, LLP, New York (Philip H. Seelig of counsel), for appellant.

Michael A. Cardozo, Corporation Counsel, New York (Ronald E. Sternberg of counsel), for respondents.

Before: Tom, J.P., Mazzarelli, Acosta, DeGrasse and Richter, JJ.


The record discloses a rational basis for petitioner's demotion, as the evidence amply supports the conclusion that his job performance was unsatisfactory ( see Matter of Johnson v Katz, 68 NY2d 649, 650). Petitioner did not meet his burden of establishing that the demotion was made in bad faith ( see e.g. Matter of Chow v City of N.Y. Dept. of Health, 303 AD2d 237). Although respondents technically failed to follow the procedures for conducting and preparing petitioner's performance evaluations, the delays were undertaken in an attempt to provide petitioner with time to bring his performance up to department standards and did not evince bad faith ( see e.g. Matter of Smith v City of New York, 118 Misc 2d 227).

We have considered petitioner's remaining arguments and find them unavailing.

[Prior Case History: 2009 NY Slip Op 30581(U).]


Summaries of

In re Davids

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department
Apr 22, 2010
72 A.D.3d 557 (N.Y. App. Div. 2010)
Case details for

In re Davids

Case Details

Full title:In the Matter of JOSEPH DAVIDS, Appellant, v. CITY OF NEW YORK et al.…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department

Date published: Apr 22, 2010

Citations

72 A.D.3d 557 (N.Y. App. Div. 2010)
2010 N.Y. Slip Op. 3247
898 N.Y.S.2d 456

Citing Cases

Wilson v. City of New York

That fact is not challenged. Rather, in paragraph 25 of the opposition to the Reply, counsel for the…

Pepin v. N.Y.C. Dep't of Educ.

A procedural infirmity in petitioner's 2009-2010 school year performance rating, far from being…